Wu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 621

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeGleeson, J.
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Subject MatterIMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,CIVIL RIGHTS,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Date03 June 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Shabdeen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 492
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 6, 2020
    ...The officer did not have an obligation to seek out additional or updated information: Wu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 621 at para 28. [10] This is not a case where the officer raised an entirely new issue, such as the allegation of human trafficking raised in the Alabi ca......
  • Petinglay v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1371
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 31, 2019
    ...review (Nguyen v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1207 at paras 36-37; Wu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 621 at para 31). [27] It is settled law that an appeal to the IAD is a de novo hearing in a broad sense, where the IAD is required to determine whether the ......
  • Gan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1186
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 21, 2017
    ...the content of the duty of fairness is at the lower end of the spectrum (Wu v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 621 at para [13]           Decisions involving TRP applications are reviewed using the reasonableness sta......
  • Ouansa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 632
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 20, 2020
    ...considerable deference is owed to the Officer’s decision in these circumstances, citing Wu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 621 at paras 14, 23. The Respondent submits that the Applicant has not demonstrated that there is a compelling reason here. [22]  For the ba......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Shabdeen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 492
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 6, 2020
    ...The officer did not have an obligation to seek out additional or updated information: Wu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 621 at para 28. [10] This is not a case where the officer raised an entirely new issue, such as the allegation of human trafficking raised in the Alabi ca......
  • Petinglay v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1371
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 31, 2019
    ...review (Nguyen v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1207 at paras 36-37; Wu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 621 at para 31). [27] It is settled law that an appeal to the IAD is a de novo hearing in a broad sense, where the IAD is required to determine whether the ......
  • Gan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1186
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 21, 2017
    ...the content of the duty of fairness is at the lower end of the spectrum (Wu v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 621 at para [13]           Decisions involving TRP applications are reviewed using the reasonableness sta......
  • Ouansa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 632
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 20, 2020
    ...considerable deference is owed to the Officer’s decision in these circumstances, citing Wu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 621 at paras 14, 23. The Respondent submits that the Applicant has not demonstrated that there is a compelling reason here. [22]  For the ba......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT