Wuziuk v. Director of Social Services, (1979) 3 Man.R.(2d) 81 (CA)
Judge | Hall, O'Sullivan and Huband, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
Case Date | November 23, 1979 |
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Citations | (1979), 3 Man.R.(2d) 81 (CA) |
Wuziuk v. Social Services Director (1979), 3 Man.R.(2d) 81 (CA)
MLB headnote and full text
Wuziuk v. Director of Social Services (No. 2)
Indexed As: Wuziuk v. Director of Social Services
Manitoba Court of Appeal
Hall, O'Sullivan and Huband, JJ.A.
November 23, 1979.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Social Assistance - Topic 1026
Claims - Appeal to the courts - Leave to appeal on a question of law - Social Allowances Act, s. 9(7),(8) - The Manitoba Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal on a question of law where the issue presented was what constitutes a "financial resource" of a recipient of social assistance.
Statutes Noticed:
Social Allowances Act, R.S.M. 1970, c. S-160, sect. 9(7), sect. 9(8) [para. 5].
Counsel:
G.P.S. Riley, for the appellant/appellant;
E. Rodin, for the respondent/respondent.
This application was heard by HALL, O'SULLIVAN and HUBAND, JJ.A., of the Manitoba Court of Appeal on November 15, 1979.
The judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered by HUBAND, J.A., on November 23, 1979.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Children's Clubhouse v. Helgason et al., [2012] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 19 (CA)
...other similar disputes which are apt to arise in [the] future" ( Wuziuk v. Manitoba (Director of Social Services) (No. 2) (1979), 3 Man.R. (2d) 81 (Man. C.A.), at para. 7). 3. There must be an arguable case of substance; i.e., one with a reasonable prospect of success (see Lejins v. Manitob......
-
Winnipeg Airports Authority Inc. v. EllisDon Corp.,
...Insurance Corp. et al., [2003] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 8 ; 2003 MBCA 14 , refd to. [para. 30]. Wuziuk v. Director of Social Services (1979), 3 Man.R.(2d) 81 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Director of Employment Standards Division (Man.) v. Shier et al. (2007), 214 Man.R.(2d) 189 ; 395 W.A.C. 189 ; 2......
-
Curtis et al. v. Manitoba Securities Commission, (2006) 201 Man.R.(2d) 203 (CA)
...the mere fact that such a point is raised does not entitle him to leave. ... 'In Wuziuk v. Director of Social Services (No. 2) (1979), 3 Man.R.(2d) 81, this court, speaking through Huband, J.A., said, (at p. 83): "... The issue must be one of importance: not just for the immediate case, but......
-
Edison Rental Agency v. Klippenstein, [2011] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 8 (CA)
...other similar disputes which are apt to arise in [the] future' ( Wuziuk v. Manitoba (Director of Social Services) (No. 2) (1979), 3 Man.R.(2d) 81 (Man. C.A.), at para. 7). 3. There must be an arguable case of substance; i.e., one with a reasonable prospect of success (see Lejins v. Manitoba......
-
Children's Clubhouse v. Helgason et al., [2012] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 19 (CA)
...other similar disputes which are apt to arise in [the] future" ( Wuziuk v. Manitoba (Director of Social Services) (No. 2) (1979), 3 Man.R. (2d) 81 (Man. C.A.), at para. 7). 3. There must be an arguable case of substance; i.e., one with a reasonable prospect of success (see Lejins v. Manitob......
-
Winnipeg Airports Authority Inc. v. EllisDon Corp.,
...Insurance Corp. et al., [2003] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 8 ; 2003 MBCA 14 , refd to. [para. 30]. Wuziuk v. Director of Social Services (1979), 3 Man.R.(2d) 81 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Director of Employment Standards Division (Man.) v. Shier et al. (2007), 214 Man.R.(2d) 189 ; 395 W.A.C. 189 ; 2......
-
Curtis et al. v. Manitoba Securities Commission, (2006) 201 Man.R.(2d) 203 (CA)
...the mere fact that such a point is raised does not entitle him to leave. ... 'In Wuziuk v. Director of Social Services (No. 2) (1979), 3 Man.R.(2d) 81, this court, speaking through Huband, J.A., said, (at p. 83): "... The issue must be one of importance: not just for the immediate case, but......
-
Edison Rental Agency v. Klippenstein, [2011] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 8 (CA)
...other similar disputes which are apt to arise in [the] future' ( Wuziuk v. Manitoba (Director of Social Services) (No. 2) (1979), 3 Man.R.(2d) 81 (Man. C.A.), at para. 7). 3. There must be an arguable case of substance; i.e., one with a reasonable prospect of success (see Lejins v. Manitoba......