Xun v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1837

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date19 November 2025
Citation2025 FC 1837

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Isla v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 8, 2026
    ...3004 (FCA), [1994] 1 FC 742 (FCA) at 766, aff’d 1994 CanLII 47 (SCC), [1994] 3 SCR 1100; Yuehong v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1837 at para 39 [19] As noted, these requirements are conjunctive, so in order for a writ of mandamus to be issued, an applicant must have satisfi......
  • Mai v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 9, 2026
    ...should be given little to no weight. [16] As recently noted by Justice Cecily Y. Strickland in Xun v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1837 at paragraph 17, in such circumstances, affidavits at this Court have either been found to be inadmissible (for example, in Molchanova v Ca......
  • Manes v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 19, 2026
    ...order of mandamus (Cheloei v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 820 at para 13; Yuehong v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1837 at para [18] The parties dispute whether the Applicant has met the elements for an order of mandamus. As is often the case for mandamus app......
3 cases
  • Isla v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 8, 2026
    ...3004 (FCA), [1994] 1 FC 742 (FCA) at 766, aff’d 1994 CanLII 47 (SCC), [1994] 3 SCR 1100; Yuehong v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1837 at para 39 [19] As noted, these requirements are conjunctive, so in order for a writ of mandamus to be issued, an applicant must have satisfi......
  • Mai v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 9, 2026
    ...should be given little to no weight. [16] As recently noted by Justice Cecily Y. Strickland in Xun v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1837 at paragraph 17, in such circumstances, affidavits at this Court have either been found to be inadmissible (for example, in Molchanova v Ca......
  • Manes v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 19, 2026
    ...order of mandamus (Cheloei v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 820 at para 13; Yuehong v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1837 at para [18] The parties dispute whether the Applicant has met the elements for an order of mandamus. As is often the case for mandamus app......