Yat Sun Food Products Ltd v. Griffith Foods International Inc, 2025 FC 1688
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 10 October 2025 |
| Citation | 2025 FC 1688 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
Products Unlimited, Inc v. Five Seasons Comfort Limited
...force. The amended subsection 56(5) therefore applies to this appeal: see Yat Sun Food Products Ltd v Griffith Foods International Inc, 2025 FC 1688 at paras 31–46; Trademarks Act, ss 69.1, 70(1)(d). As discussed further below, Products Unlimited sought leave to file additional evidence. Th......
-
Big Duck Games, LLC v. X-Flow LTD., 2025 FC 1704
...newly enacted subsection 56(5) was recently considered by Justice Fuhrer in Yat Sun Food Products Ltd v Griffith Foods International Inc, 2025 FC 1688 [Yat Sun Food]. In that case, like here, the appellant’s Notice of Application was filed before April 1, 2025; however, the parties’ evidenc......
1 cases
-
Big Duck Games, LLC v. X-Flow LTD., 2025 FC 1704
...newly enacted subsection 56(5) was recently considered by Justice Fuhrer in Yat Sun Food Products Ltd v Griffith Foods International Inc, 2025 FC 1688 [Yat Sun Food]. In that case, like here, the appellant’s Notice of Application was filed before April 1, 2025; however, the parties’ evidenc......