Yee v. Telus International (Cda) Inc.
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Morgan, Edward M. |
| Citation | 2026 ONSC 3165 |
| Docket Number | CV-25-00735809-00CP |
| Date | 02 June 2026 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
To Stay Or Not To Stay: The Arrival Of Parallel Canadian Securities Class Actions
...and procedural requirements in each province may demand materially different evidentiary responses. Footnotes 1. S.O. 1992, c. 6. 2. 2026 ONSC 3165. 3. Recent examples include Kirsh v. Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2021 ONSC 6190, InvestorCOM v. L'Anton, 2025 BCCA 40, and Strathdee v. Johnson & Joh......
-
Yee v. Telus International (Cda) Inc.
...under section 5(6)-(8) of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, So 1992, c. 6, as amended (“CPA”): Yee v. Telus International (Cda) Inc., 2026 ONSC 3165. He deserves his costs of the [2] Counsel for the Plaintiff submits that the motion......
1 cases
-
Yee v. Telus International (Cda) Inc.
...under section 5(6)-(8) of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, So 1992, c. 6, as amended (“CPA”): Yee v. Telus International (Cda) Inc., 2026 ONSC 3165. He deserves his costs of the [2] Counsel for the Plaintiff submits that the motion......
1 firm's commentaries
-
To Stay Or Not To Stay: The Arrival Of Parallel Canadian Securities Class Actions
...and procedural requirements in each province may demand materially different evidentiary responses. Footnotes 1. S.O. 1992, c. 6. 2. 2026 ONSC 3165. 3. Recent examples include Kirsh v. Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2021 ONSC 6190, InvestorCOM v. L'Anton, 2025 BCCA 40, and Strathdee v. Johnson & Joh......
