Zafar v. Saiyid

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeHourigan J.A.
Citation2017 ONCA 919
Date28 November 2017
Docket NumberM48523 (C64581)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 20 ' 24, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 27, 2022
    ...Schedule 2 to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, SO 1991, c 18, s 25.4, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 63.02, Zafar v Saiyid, 2017 ONCA 919, M & M Homes Inc. v. 2088556 Ontario Inc, 2020 ONCA 134, Fontaine v Canada (Attorney General), 2012 ONCA 206, Morguard Residential v Mandel, 2......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 19-23)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 27, 2021
    ...Real Property, Mortgages, Civil Procedure, Default Judgment, Remedies, Possession, Appeals, Stay Pending Appeal, Zafar v. Saiyid, 2017 ONCA 919, Circuit World Corp. v. Lesperance, 33 O.R. (3d) 674, M & M Homes Inc. v. 2088556 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONCA 134, RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorn......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 28-30)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 2, 2021
    ...York University v. Markicevic, 2017 ONCA 651, Zeitoun v. Economical Insurance Group (2008), 91 O.R. (3d) 131 (Div. Ct.), Zafar v. Saiyid, 2017 ONCA 919 M.P.M. v. A.L.M., 2021 ONCA 465 Keywords: Family Law, Custody and Access, Best Interests of Child, Appeals, Orders, Children's Law Reform A......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 4-8, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 13, 2021
    ...and s. 65.1(2), Children's Law Reform Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.12, s. 22, s. 23, and s. 40, N. v. F., 2021 ONCA 614, Zafar v. Saiyid, 2017 ONCA 919, Geliedan v. Radwah, 2020 ONCA 254, D.C. v. T.B., 2021 ONCA 562, K.K. v. M.M., 2021 ONCA 407, BTR Global Opportunity Trading Limited v. RBC Dexia......
  • Get Started for Free
3 cases
  • Hume v. 11534599 Canada Corp.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 27, 2021
    ...the test is the same as that for an interlocutory injunction. The overarching consideration is the interests of justice: Zafar v. Saiyid, 2017 ONCA 919, at para. 18; Circuit World Corp. v. Lesperance (1997), 33 O.R. (3d) 674 (C.A.), at para. [12]       The fact......
  • M & M Homes Inc. v. 2088556 Ontario Inc.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • February 18, 2020
    ...would stay the vesting order. [29] The overarching consideration in whether to grant a stay is the interests of justice: Zafar v. Saiyid, 2017 ONCA 919, at para. 18. This is determined by a holistic consideration of the factors identified in the RJR-MacDonald Inc., at p. 334, for assessing ......
  • Booth v. Bilek
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 6, 2020
    ...of the parties would suffer greater harm from the granting or refusal of the remedy pending a decision on the merits: Zafar v. Saiyid, 2017 ONCA 919, at paras. 17-18. [8]      The test is cumulative, meaning the appellant must satisfy all three prongs in order to ac......
6 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 20 ' 24, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 27, 2022
    ...Schedule 2 to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, SO 1991, c 18, s 25.4, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 63.02, Zafar v Saiyid, 2017 ONCA 919, M & M Homes Inc. v. 2088556 Ontario Inc, 2020 ONCA 134, Fontaine v Canada (Attorney General), 2012 ONCA 206, Morguard Residential v Mandel, 2......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 19-23)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 27, 2021
    ...Real Property, Mortgages, Civil Procedure, Default Judgment, Remedies, Possession, Appeals, Stay Pending Appeal, Zafar v. Saiyid, 2017 ONCA 919, Circuit World Corp. v. Lesperance, 33 O.R. (3d) 674, M & M Homes Inc. v. 2088556 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONCA 134, RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorn......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 28-30)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 2, 2021
    ...York University v. Markicevic, 2017 ONCA 651, Zeitoun v. Economical Insurance Group (2008), 91 O.R. (3d) 131 (Div. Ct.), Zafar v. Saiyid, 2017 ONCA 919 M.P.M. v. A.L.M., 2021 ONCA 465 Keywords: Family Law, Custody and Access, Best Interests of Child, Appeals, Orders, Children's Law Reform A......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 4-8, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 13, 2021
    ...and s. 65.1(2), Children's Law Reform Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.12, s. 22, s. 23, and s. 40, N. v. F., 2021 ONCA 614, Zafar v. Saiyid, 2017 ONCA 919, Geliedan v. Radwah, 2020 ONCA 254, D.C. v. T.B., 2021 ONCA 562, K.K. v. M.M., 2021 ONCA 407, BTR Global Opportunity Trading Limited v. RBC Dexia......
  • Get Started for Free