Zafra v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 420
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 420 |
| Date | 19 April 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Kandiah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1096
...the onus lies with the applicant to explain the basis of the application (citing Zafra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 420 at para 18). I agree with the Respondent but only to a point. [36] The Officer confined his review of H&C factors to whether or not the Applicant an......
-
Sioco v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1286
...member analysis must be assessed holistically as a part of the broader H&C analysis: Zafra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 420 at para 27. The Respondent also extensively cites pre-Kanthasamy jurisprudence emphasizing the exceptional nature of H&C relief: Legau......
-
Addae v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 375
...(Cristobal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 572 [Cristobal] at paras 19, 41; Zafra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 420 at para 21; Okbai v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 229 at paras 18-19). [40] The Applicants refer to the Guidelines which stat......
-
Cristobal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 572
...onus is ultimately on applicant to show that an H&C exemption is warranted (Zafra v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 420 at para 25). [22] In a case cited by the Applicant, Radix v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2004 FC 1253, Justice Cam......
4 cases
-
Kandiah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1096
...the onus lies with the applicant to explain the basis of the application (citing Zafra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 420 at para 18). I agree with the Respondent but only to a point. [36] The Officer confined his review of H&C factors to whether or not the Applicant an......
-
Sioco v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1286
...member analysis must be assessed holistically as a part of the broader H&C analysis: Zafra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 420 at para 27. The Respondent also extensively cites pre-Kanthasamy jurisprudence emphasizing the exceptional nature of H&C relief: Legau......
-
Addae v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 375
...(Cristobal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 572 [Cristobal] at paras 19, 41; Zafra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 420 at para 21; Okbai v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 229 at paras 18-19). [40] The Applicants refer to the Guidelines which stat......
-
Cristobal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 572
...onus is ultimately on applicant to show that an H&C exemption is warranted (Zafra v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 420 at para 25). [22] In a case cited by the Applicant, Radix v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2004 FC 1253, Justice Cam......