Zeifmans LLP v. Mitec Technologies Inc.
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Mr. Justice Chalmers |
| Citation | 2019 ONSC 3643 |
| Date | 11 June 2019 |
| Docket Number | CV-18-594543 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc
...v Alharayeri, 2017 SCC 39 at paras 49-50; Budd v Gentra, 1998 Canlii 5811 (ONCA) at para 52; Zeifmans LLP v. Mitec Technologies Inc., 2019 ONSC 3643 at para [543] Second, the Court must consider whether, in light of the fact that oppression is intended to correct injustice between the parti......
-
Binscarth Holdings LP v. Anthony
...para. 41; Chandler v. Sun Life Financial (2006), 14 B.L.R. (4th) 171 (Ont. S.C.), at para. 20; Zeifmans LLP v. Mitec Technologies Inc., 2019 ONSC 3643, 98 B.L.R. (5th) 90, at para. 76; and Re Loeb & Provigo Inc. (1978), 20 O.R. (2d) 497 (H.C.), at p. [64] To date, the Ontario legislatur......
-
Parallel Derivative And Oppression Actions: New Guidance For Investors In Closely Held Corporations
...at para 46. 14. Clark, atpara 104, citing Drake, at para 13. 15. Clark, atparas 105–106, citing Zeifmans LLP v. Mitec Technologies Inc., 2019 ONSC 3643, at paras 80-81; Melnyk v. Acerus Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 2017 ONSC 1285, at paras 16. Clark, at para 107, citing Crescent (1942) Ltd.......
-
Clark v. Cen-Ta Real Estate Ltd et al
...derivative action only benefit the complainant to the exclusion of the company. I note that in Zeifmans LLP v. Mitec Technologies Inc. 2019 ONSC 3643, at para. 78, where the creditor sought leave primarily to secure payment of its own invoice rather than a broader corporate [92] Although th......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc, 2021 ABQB 82
...v Alharayeri, 2017 SCC 39 at paras 49-50; Budd v Gentra, 1998 Canlii 5811 (ONCA) at para 52; Zeifmans LLP v. Mitec Technologies Inc., 2019 ONSC 3643 at para [543] Second, the Court must consider whether, in light of the fact that oppression is intended to correct injustice between the parti......
-
Binscarth Holdings LP v Anthony
...para. 41; Chandler v. Sun Life Financial (2006), 14 B.L.R. (4th) 171 (Ont. S.C.), at para. 20; Zeifmans LLP v. Mitec Technologies Inc., 2019 ONSC 3643, 98 B.L.R. (5th) 90, at para. 76; and Re Loeb & Provigo Inc. (1978), 20 O.R. (2d) 497 (H.C.), at p. 64 To date, the Ontario legislature ......
-
Ninth Square Capital v. Boyes et al.
...[7] Wilson at para 32 citing M. Koehnen, Oppression and Related Remedies (2004), at p. 201. [8] Zeifmans LLP v. Mitec Technologies Inc., 2019 ONSC 3643 [9] Mudrick Capital Management LP v. Wright 2019 ABQB 662,   [10] Mudrick at para. 111. [11] Burns v. RBC Life Insurance Company,......
-
Clark v Cen-Ta Real Estate Ltd et Al
...derivative action only benefit the complainant to the exclusion of the company. I note that in Zeifmans LLP v. Mitec Technologies Inc. 2019 ONSC 3643, at para. 78, where the creditor sought leave primarily to secure payment of its own invoice rather than a broader corporate 92 Although ther......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Parallel Derivative And Oppression Actions: New Guidance For Investors In Closely Held Corporations
...at para 46. 14. Clark, atpara 104, citing Drake, at para 13. 15. Clark, atparas 105–106, citing Zeifmans LLP v. Mitec Technologies Inc., 2019 ONSC 3643, at paras 80-81; Melnyk v. Acerus Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 2017 ONSC 1285, at paras 16. Clark, at para 107, citing Crescent (1942) Ltd.......
