Nikolova v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 382
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 382 |
| Date | 09 April 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Alexander v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 438
...not relied on his mother’s narrative in 2012, the second RPD would not have been bound by this conclusion (Nikolova v Canada (MCI), 2018 FC 382 at para [27] Mr. Alexander’s argument that the 2012 narrative should not have been considered is without merit. C. The RPD’s c......
-
Salajova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 823
...that the standard of review of the RPD’s identity findings is reasonableness (Nikolova v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 382 at para 8). [12] Further, deference is owned to the RPD on identity findings as such findings are at the core of the RPD’s expertise (Diarra v......
2 cases
-
Alexander v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 438
...not relied on his mother’s narrative in 2012, the second RPD would not have been bound by this conclusion (Nikolova v Canada (MCI), 2018 FC 382 at para [27] Mr. Alexander’s argument that the 2012 narrative should not have been considered is without merit. C. The RPD’s c......
-
Salajova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 823
...that the standard of review of the RPD’s identity findings is reasonableness (Nikolova v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 382 at para 8). [12] Further, deference is owned to the RPD on identity findings as such findings are at the core of the RPD’s expertise (Diarra v......