- Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (64152)
- Supreme Court of British Columbia (53721)
- Federal Court (37100)
- Supreme Court of Canada (26041)
- Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (25847)
- Ontario Court of Appeal (22459)
- Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan (17540)
- Court of Appeal of British Columbia (16980)
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (15227)
- Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (13033)
- Court of Appeal (Alberta) (12849)
- Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) (11199)
- Ontario Court of Justice (9912)
- Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (9756)
- Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, Trial Division (8513)
- Provincial Court (Alberta) (7458)
- Court of Appeal of New Brunswick (6348)
- Court of Appeal (Manitoba) (6070)
- Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan (5867)
- Nova Scotia Court of Appeal (3883)
- Newfoundland Court of Appeal (2677)
- Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (2624)
- Provincial Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (1540)
- Provincial Court of Nova Scotia (1193)
- Small Claims Court of Nova Scotia (1085)
- Provincial Court of Manitoba (1044)
- Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories (906)
- Tax Court of Canada (808)
- Territorial Court of Yukon (724)
- Provincial Court of New Brunswick (683)
- Nunavut Court of Justicie (382)
- Court of Appeal (Yukon Territory) (277)
- Territorial Court of the Northwest Territories (218)
- Court of Appeal for the Northwest Territories (123)
- Nova Scotia Probate Court (108)
- Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island (107)
- Court of Appeal of Nunavaut (97)
- Provincial Court of British Columbia (22)
- 1151390 Ontario Inc. et al v. Metrolinx, 2021 ONSC 347
- Hutterian Brethren Church of Rosebud v Canadian Western Trust Company, 2021 ABCA 8
- 1777453 Alberta Ltd v Got Mold Disaster Recovery Services Inc, 2021 ABCA 9
- R. v. Patriquin, 2021 ONSC 359
- Margulis v. E. Manson Investment Limited, 2021 ONSC 377
- Dillman v. Dillman, 2021 ONSC 326
- John Howard Society of Canada v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2021 ONSC 380
 The applicant, John Howard Society of Canada (“JHSC”), seeks a declaration that s. 163(3) of the Corrections and Conditional Release Regulations, SOR/92-620 (the “Regulations”) is invalid as it violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms s. 7 protected right to life, liberty, and security of the person in a manner that is not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice and is not demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society under s. 1.
- Reference re Public Services Sustainability (2015) Act, 2021 NSCA 9
- Primont Homes (Vaughan) Inc. v. Maplequest (Vaughan) Developments Inc., 2021 ONSC 102
- R v. Simonelli, 2021 ONSC 354
- R. v. Cody, 349 CCC (3d) 488
 In R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27,  1 S.C.R. 631, this Court identified a culture of complacency towards delay in the criminal justice system. This culture was fostered by doctrinal and practical difficulties plaguing the analytical framework then applicable to the ...
- R. v. Boutilier, 2017 SCC 64
 The appellant, Mr. Boutilier, challenges the constitutional validity of s. 753(1) and (4.1) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 , two provisions at the core of the dangerous offender regime, under ss. 7 and 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and...
- R. v. Marakah, 142 WCB (2d) 490
 Can Canadians ever reasonably expect the text messages they send to remain private, even after the messages have reached their destination? Or is the state free, regardless of the circumstances, to access text messages from a recipient’s device without a warrant?...
- Douez v. Facebook, Inc., 411 DLR (4th) 434
 Forum selection clauses purport to oust the jurisdiction of otherwise competent courts in favour of a foreign jurisdiction. To balance contractual freedom with the public good in having local courts adjudicate certain claims, courts have developed a test to...
- R. v. Antic,  SCJ No 27 (QL)
 The right not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause is an essential element of an enlightened criminal justice system. It entrenches the effect of the presumption of innocence at the pre-trial stage of the criminal trial process and safeguards the liberty...
- R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35
 Hearsay is an out-of-court statement tendered for the truth of its contents. It is presumptively inadmissible because — in the absence of the opportunity to cross-examine the declarant at the time the statement is made — it is often difficult for the trier of fact...
- Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia,  SCJ No 32 (QL)
 In British Columbia, the scope of appellate intervention in commercial arbitration is narrow in two key ways. First, there is limited jurisdiction for appellate review of arbitration awards because that jurisdiction is statutorily limited to questions of law (Arbitra...
- Tran v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness),  2 SCR 289
 Côté J. — Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 (“IRPA ”), recognizes that there are important social, cultural and economic benefits to immigration. It also recognizes that successful integration of permanent residents involves mutual...
- R. v. Jones,  2 SCR 696
 The appellant, Mr. Jones, was convicted of several firearms and drug trafficking offences. His convictions rest on records of text messages seized from a Telus account associated with his co-accused pursuant to a production order obtained under s. 487.012 (now s. 48...
- Delta Air Lines Inc. v. Lukács, 416 DLR (4th) 579
 The respondent, Dr. Gábor Lukács, filed a complaint with the Canadian Transportation Agency (“Agency”), alleging that the appellant, Delta Air Lines Inc. (“Delta”), applied discriminatory practices governing the carriage of obese persons. The Agency dismissed this...