Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
- HM the King v Rhett Holynski,
- HM the King v Adam Samuel Bachorcik,
- Jeff Paziuk v Roger Regnier,
- Thuy Truong v Phong Le and Quy Pham,
- HM the King v Maxime Bernier,
- HM the King v Adrian Cote,
- HM the King v Clayton Friday,
- HM the King v Doyle McGillis,
- HM the King v Carrie Dawn Bellerose,
- HM the King v Marjaleena Repo,
- HM the King v Jeffrey Muma,
- Carter James Henderson and Allen Scott Henderson v Cody Ryckman,
- HM the King v Brent O. Nerenberg,
- HM the King v Annette Custer,
- HM the King v E.C.O.,
- HM the King v Cal Timothy Henderson,
- HM the King v Anthony Lance Swanson,
-
R. v. Fern,
Roadside detention. Breath samples. Right to counsel. Screening device. Police station. Counsel of choice
-
R. v. Zaya,
Lawful grounds. Open liquor in the back seat. Police officer. Use of force
-
R. v. Crain,
Person escape criminal liability. Mens rea. Direct evidence. Murder weapon. Reasonable jury
-
R. v. Natomagan,
Offence of hunting on private land without permission. Hunting party. Right of access. Stay of proceedings. Cow moose
-
Apodaca v. The Regina Police Service,
[1] Tanya Apodaca, Gerald Ferguson, Cindy Gall, Christina Hagel, Jasmine Grandel, Erinn Knoll, Brenda Kriese, Tamara Lavoie, Edward Palchinski, and John Slastukin are charged that on or about May 15, 2021 at Regina, Saskatchewan they did fail to comply with a Public Health Order by attending a gathering exceeding 10 people, contrary to section 61 of&
-
R. v. Hotomanie,
Offenders for all offences in sentencing. Convictions for dangerous driving. Drinking problem. Probation officer
-
Taylor v. Berger,
Measure of damages for wrongful conversion. General costs. Register the vehicle. Personal property. Trier of fact
-
Hartt v. City of Melfort,
Collective agreement. Binding arbitration clauses. Grievance procedure
-
R. v. Benedicto,
Searches of personal electronic devices. Domestic criminal law enforcement context. Child pornography. Cell phone
-
R. v. Anderson,
Common law power of investigative detention. Police vehicle. Unreasonable search. Expectation of privacy. Private property
-
R. v. Friesen,
[1] Mark Friesen is charged that on December 12, 2020 at Regina, Saskatchewan he did fail to comply with a Public Health Order, dated November 26, 2020 (“impugned PHO”), by participating in an outdoor public/private gathering of more than 30 people, contrary to section 61 of The Public Health Act, 1994, SS 1994, c P-37.1 [the Act]
-
R. v. Friesen,
[1] Mark Friesen is charged that on December 12, 2020 at Regina, Saskatchewan he did fail to comply with a Public Health Order, dated November 26, 2020 (the “PHO”), by participating in a outdoor public/private gathering of more than 30 people, contrary to section 61 of to The Public Health Act, 1994, SS 1994, c P-37.1 [the Act].
-
R. v Gillingwater and Desjarlais,
Animal protection. Seizure of the dogs. Evidence of the unsanitary condition