Case Law

Sources in this library

• Canadian Caselaw
• Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal of Ontario

Latest documents

• Ramandi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 873

  [1] The Applicant, Mohammad Ghamoushi Ramandi, a citizen of Iran, came to Canada in April 2017 as a visitor. He claimed refugee status alleging that the Iranian authorities were seeking him due to his conversion to Christianity, a fact which the Iranian authorities discovered while he was in Canada.

• Pal c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration), 2025 CF 855

  [1] Les demandeurs sollicitent le contrôle judiciaire d’une décision de la Section d’appel des réfugiés [SAR] rendue le 22 mars 2024 [la Décision], statuant qu’ils n’ont pas la qualité de réfugié, ni de personne à protéger, au sens des articles 96 et 97 de la Loi sur l’immigration et la protection des réfugiés, LC 2001, c 27 [LIPR], puisqu’ils bénéficient d’une possibilité de refuge intérieur [PRI] à Delhi et Mumbai.

• Sandhu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 857

  [1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision dated February 8, 2024, of the Immigration Appeal Division (“IAD”) to dismiss the Applicant’s appeal of the refusal of his permanent resident travel document because he did not meet the residency requirement to be present in Canada for 730 days in the five years preceding the application, as set out in subparagraph 28(2)(a)(i) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA], and that there were insufficient humanitarian factors to overcome the residency breach (“Decision”).

• Papaquash v. Cote, 2025 FC 859

  [1] This Application for judicial review concerns the June 12, 2022 election held at Key First Nation (KFN). Although the judicial review Application was filed on July 12, 2022, moving this Application to a hearing has been delayed on multiple occasions primarily due to the Applicants’ failure to meet filing deadlines imposed through the case management process.

• Ali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 865

  [1] This is the judicial review of the decisions of an Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] Officer refusing the application of Rasheed Ali for Authorization to Return to Canada [ARC] and a Temporary Resident Permit [TRP].[1]For the reasons set out below, I am granting the application.

• Marcel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 863

  [1] The Applicants seek judicial review of the refusal of their application for permanent residence from within Canada on humanitarian and compassionate (“H&C”) grounds.

• Lac Ste. Anne Métis Community Association v. Canada (Minister of Finance), 2025 FC 864

  [1] The Government of Canada initiated discussions aimed at granting an equity stake in the Trans Mountain pipeline project to Indigenous groups affected by the project. The Minister of Finance [the Minister], however, decided that the applicants were ineligible to take part in those discussions, mainly because they are not recognized by Canada as the holders of rights recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, even though both applicants were consulted regarding the impacts of the project. The applicants are now seeking judicial review of their exclusion.

• Majoros v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 843

  [1] The Applicants, Anita Horvathne Majoros [Anita], Attila Horvath [Attila], Alex Horvath [Alex], Leila Melani Horvath [Leila], Reka Valeria Racz [Reka], and Gabor Mate [Gabor] are all Roma citizens of Hungary. In June 2018, the Applicants gained Convention refugee protection in Canada.

• Olaribigbe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 844

  [1] The Applicant, Gabisiu Olakunle Olaribigbe, seeks judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) dated February 16, 2024 dismissing his appeal and confirming the Refugee Protection Division’s (RPD) decision that he is neither a convention refugee nor a person in need of protection under section 96 and subsection 97(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA].

• Xue v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 837

  [1] The Respondent brings this motion to strike the Applicant’s application for leave and for judicial review under Rule 369 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106. The Applicant seeks an order of mandamus compelling the Respondent to decide their study permit application submitted on March 1, 2024.