Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

Case Law

Sources in this library

Jurisdiction

Latest documents

  • Honeybee Enterprises Ltd. (Honeybee Centre) v. Marks & Clerk, 2023 FC 1262

    [1] Honeybee Enterprises Ltd., dba Honeybee Centre, appeals a decision of the Trademarks Opposition Board, on behalf of the Registrar of Trademarks, bearing the citation 2022 TMOB 267 [Decision]. In the Decision, made pursuant to section 45 of the Trademarks Act, RSC 1985, c T-13, the Registrar expunged certain goods and services from Honeybee’s trademark registration No. TMA728,046, HONEYBEE CENTRE & Design:

  • Litkouhi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1265

    [1] Ms. Golshid Litkouhi (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of the decision of an Officer, refusing her application for a visitor’s visa. In a separate decision, the Officer refused the application of the Applicant’s daughter for a study permit. That negative decision was challenged by way of an application for leave and judicial review in cause number IMM-6816-21.

  • Babania v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1266

    [1] Ms. Misha Babani (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of the decision of an Officer, refusing her application for a study permit. In a separate decision, the Officer refused the application of Ms. Golshid Litkouhi, mother of the Applicant, for a visitor’s visa.

  • Buttar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1264

    [1] Mr. Jeewan Singh Buttar (the “Principal Applicant”), his wife Mrs. Tirath Kaur Buttar, his adult daughter Ms. Jaspreet Kaur Buttar and his minor son Nishandeep Singh Buttar (collectively “the Applicants”) seek judicial review of the decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board, Refugee Appeal Division (the “RAD”). In the decision, the RAD dismissed the Applicants’ appeal from the decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board, Refugee Protection Division (the “RPD”), denying their claim for protection.

  • Burberry Limited v. Ward, 2023 FC 1257

    [1] The Plaintiffs are very well-known manufacturers, distributers and sellers of luxury fashion goods in Canada and around the world. In April 2021, they became aware that an individual in Canada known as Juvilyn Billones Ward (J. Ward) was importing, offering for sale and selling counterfeit Burberry and Chanel clothing and fashion accessories. Despite J. Ward’s initial agreement to cease her activities and to relinquish the counterfeit goods then in her possession, she has continued to import and sell counterfeit Burberry and Chanel products through a changing and expanding online presence using multiple names, aliases and Facebook pages.

  • Jahantigh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1253

    [1] In October 2019, Reza Jahantigh applied for a study permit so he could pursue a PhD in computer engineering at Montreal’s École de technologie supérieure. In December 2022, 38 months after his initial application, and 24 months after he was told his application was being processed for “background checks,” he filed this application seeking an order of mandamus to require Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] to process and render a decision on his application.

  • Dhaliwal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1249

    [1] The Applicant, Deeparani Harishkumar Dhaliwal, seeks judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Appeal Division (“IAD”) of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, dated June 23, 2022, denying the Applicant’s application to sponsor her husband to come to Canada as a member of the family class.

  • Kukoyi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1250

    [1] This is the judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Appeal Division [RAD] of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada which upheld the decision of the Refugee Protection Division [RPD] finding that the Applicants are not Convention refugees or persons in need of protection under s 96 and s 97, respectively, of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c27 [IRPA].

  • Aedo Arancibia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1245

    [1] The Applicants are a family: Fanny Aedo Arancibia (“Ms. Aedo”), who is the Principal Applicant, her common-law partner, and their two minor children. The Applicants asked for refugee protection in Canada because they feared that the authorities in Chile would not be able to protect them from the abuse of Ms. Aedo’s father (“Mr. AS”). Ms. Aedo’s mother and two siblings had recently been accepted as refugees in Canada on the grounds that they could not receive protection in Chile from Mr. AS’ abuse.

  • Yu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1247

    [1] The Applicant, Qinyao Yu, seeks judicial review of a decision of a Senior Immigration Officer (the “Officer”) of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada dated February 28, 2022, denying the Applicant’s application for permanent residence on humanitarian and compassionate (“H&C”) grounds, under subsection 25(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 (“IRPA”).

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT