Case Law

Sources in this library

• Supreme Court of Canada
• Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
• Court of Appeal (Alberta)
• Court of Appeal of British Columbia
• Supreme Court of British Columbia
• Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan
• Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
• Court of Appeal of New Brunswick
• Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, Trial Division
• Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
• Court of Appeal for the Northwest Territories
• Court of Appeal of Nunavaut
• Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
• Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
• Ontario Court of Appeal
• Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island
• Court of Appeal (Yukon Territory)
• Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
• Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba
• Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick
• Superior Court of Justice of Ontario
• Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan
• Federal Court
• Provincial Court (Alberta)
• Provincial Court of British Columbia
• Provincial Court of Manitoba
• Provincial Court of New Brunswick
• Provincial Court of Newfoundland and Labrador
• Provincial Court of Nova Scotia
• Territorial Court of the Northwest Territories
• Nunavut Court of Justicie
• Ontario Court of Justice
• Provincial Court of Saskatchewan
• Tax Court of Canada
• Territorial Court of Yukon
• Small Claims Court of Nova Scotia
• Nova Scotia Probate Court
• Newfoundland Court of Appeal

Court

Jurisdiction

Latest documents

• Canada v. CHR Investment Corporation, 2021 FCA 68

  [1] The issue in this appeal is whether the Crown should be obligated to respond to six undertaking requests made during the discovery examination of the representative of the Crown. The Tax Court of Canada concluded that the Crown should be required to produce the requested documents (if they exist) (2020 TCC 17). The Crown has appealed that Order.

• Anderson v. M.N.R., 2021 TCC 28

  [1] In 2016, was Michael M. Anderson an employee of Northern Interior Insurance Adjusters Ltd. (“NIIA”), or was his corporation, 1883022 Alberta Ltd. (“188AB”), a contractor working for NIIA? That is the question to be decided in these Appeals.

• Sabitu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 300

  [1] Further to my Judgment and Reasons issued on February 23, 2021 (2021 FC 165), the Court is addressing the following Certified questions.

• Skibsted v. Canada (Environment and Climate Change), 2021 FC 301

  [1] The Bank Swallow is a small bird – the smallest of the swallow species in North America. It builds its nests by burrowing into the steep banks of rivers or other similar terrain. In 2013, the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) determined that the Bank Swallow is a “threatened” species under the Species at Risk Act, SC 2002, c 29 [SARA] because “[t]his widespread species has shown a severe long-term decline amounting to a loss of 98% of its Canadian population over the last 40 years” (COSEWIC Report, Application Record at p 23). The Bank Swallow was officially listed as a threatened species under SARA in November 2017.

• Craig v. Niro, 2021 ONSC 2588
• R. v. Klimowicz, 2021 ONSC 2589
• Ritchie v. Castlepoint Greybrook Sterling Inc., 2021 ONCA 214
• Goldentuler v. Simmons Dasilva LLP, 2021 ONCA 219
• Intact Insurance Company v Parsons, 2021 ABCA 123
• Katz v. Hindrea, 2021 ONSC 2532