R. v. Kohut, 2020 ONSC 6213
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | G. ROBERTS J |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 6213 |
| Date | 15 October 2020 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CR-19-10000535 CR-20-10000350 CR-20-10000352 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Cao,
...any information and, as a result, there was a serious s. 8 breach which favours exclusion. He also relies upon R. v. Kohut, 2020 ONSC 6213, where Roberts J. held that while there was no evidence that the police provided false or deliberately misleading information, they did not obtain......
-
R. v. Chua,
...informants engages judicial scrutiny commonly known as the three Cs – compelling, credible, and corroboration, see R. v. Kohut 2020 ONSC 6213 at par 20. In R. v. Debot [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1140, Wilson J. said, in her concurring 60 In my view, there are at least three concerns to be addressed in......
2 cases
-
R. v. Cao,
...any information and, as a result, there was a serious s. 8 breach which favours exclusion. He also relies upon R. v. Kohut, 2020 ONSC 6213, where Roberts J. held that while there was no evidence that the police provided false or deliberately misleading information, they did not obtain......
-
R. v. Chua,
...informants engages judicial scrutiny commonly known as the three Cs – compelling, credible, and corroboration, see R. v. Kohut 2020 ONSC 6213 at par 20. In R. v. Debot [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1140, Wilson J. said, in her concurring 60 In my view, there are at least three concerns to be addressed in......