R. v. Soltan, 2019 ONCA 8

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeWatt,van Rensburg,Brown
Citation2019 ONCA 8
Date11 January 2019
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Docket NumberC62890
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. Steed, 2020 NSSC 86
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 6, 2020
    ...in Garofoli has given rise to a procedure plainly identified as a “step six procedure”. A recent example of this appears in R v Soltan, 2019 ONCA 8:[19] 5 The appellant's trial counsel sought leave to cross-examine the affiant on two issues: (a) whether the CI had a track record of providin......
  • THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR CANADA ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ELOFER,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 23, 2023
    ...to issue the warrant: R v Pires; R v Lising  at paras. 3 and 40; Garofoli, [1990] 2 SCR 1421, at p. 1654; R v Soltan, 2019 ONCA 8, at para. 6; Sadikov, at para 45; R v Green, 2015 ONCA 579, at para [144]        Generally, cross-examination would ......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 7 – 11, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 18, 2019
    ...R. v. O'Connor, [1995] 4 SCR 411, R. v. Gubbins, 2018 SCC 44, R. v. Awashish, 2018 SCC 45, s. 258(1) of the Criminal Code R. v. Soltan, 2019 ONCA 8 [Watt, van Rensburg and Brown JJ.A.] Counsel: D. C. Santoro and Z. Shariff, for the appellant J. Epstein, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal......
  • Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company v. Ridi,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 20, 2021
    ...the contract as a whole. [28] With specific reference to Statutory Accident Benefits, in Tomec v. Economical Mutual Insurance Company, 2019 ONCA 8, paragraph 42, the Court of Appeal approved the following The SABS is remedial and constitutes consumer protection legislation. As such, it is t......
3 cases
  • R. v. Steed, 2020 NSSC 86
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 6, 2020
    ...in Garofoli has given rise to a procedure plainly identified as a “step six procedure”. A recent example of this appears in R v Soltan, 2019 ONCA 8:[19] 5 The appellant's trial counsel sought leave to cross-examine the affiant on two issues: (a) whether the CI had a track record of providin......
  • THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR CANADA ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ELOFER,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 23, 2023
    ...to issue the warrant: R v Pires; R v Lising  at paras. 3 and 40; Garofoli, [1990] 2 SCR 1421, at p. 1654; R v Soltan, 2019 ONCA 8, at para. 6; Sadikov, at para 45; R v Green, 2015 ONCA 579, at para [144]        Generally, cross-examination would ......
  • Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company v. Ridi,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 20, 2021
    ...the contract as a whole. [28] With specific reference to Statutory Accident Benefits, in Tomec v. Economical Mutual Insurance Company, 2019 ONCA 8, paragraph 42, the Court of Appeal approved the following The SABS is remedial and constitutes consumer protection legislation. As such, it is t......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 7 – 11, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 18, 2019
    ...R. v. O'Connor, [1995] 4 SCR 411, R. v. Gubbins, 2018 SCC 44, R. v. Awashish, 2018 SCC 45, s. 258(1) of the Criminal Code R. v. Soltan, 2019 ONCA 8 [Watt, van Rensburg and Brown JJ.A.] Counsel: D. C. Santoro and Z. Shariff, for the appellant J. Epstein, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT