The Honourable Justice Patrick Smith v. Canada, 2020 FC 629

CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Case DateMay 21, 2020
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2020 FC 629
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • A Brief History of the Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. 50 Years of History
    • October 4, 2021
    ... (FC), af’d [2019] 3 FCR 503 (CA). 280 Girouard v Canada (Attorney General) , 2019 FC 1282 . 281 Smith v Canada (Attorney General) , 2020 FC 629 [ Smith ]. 282 Ibid. [ 67 ] The Federal CourT oF appeal and The Federal CourT of Ontario and Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould. He received......
  • IMPLEMENTING UNDRIP: AN ANALYSIS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA'S DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLESACT.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 53 No. 4, September 2021
    • September 1, 2021
    ...3rd ed (Toronto: Butterworths Canada, 1994) at 220-21 (explaining the "shared meaning rule"). A recent authority is Smith v Canada (AG), 2020 FC 629. (68) (UK), 30 & 31 Vict, c 3, s 91, reprinted in RSC 1985, Appendix II, No (69) Roberts v Canada, [1989] 1 SCR 322 at 340, 57 DLR (4th......
2 books & journal articles
  • A Brief History of the Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. 50 Years of History
    • October 4, 2021
    ... (FC), af’d [2019] 3 FCR 503 (CA). 280 Girouard v Canada (Attorney General) , 2019 FC 1282 . 281 Smith v Canada (Attorney General) , 2020 FC 629 [ Smith ]. 282 Ibid. [ 67 ] The Federal CourT oF appeal and The Federal CourT of Ontario and Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould. He received......
  • IMPLEMENTING UNDRIP: AN ANALYSIS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA'S DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLESACT.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 53 No. 4, September 2021
    • September 1, 2021
    ...3rd ed (Toronto: Butterworths Canada, 1994) at 220-21 (explaining the "shared meaning rule"). A recent authority is Smith v Canada (AG), 2020 FC 629. (68) (UK), 30 & 31 Vict, c 3, s 91, reprinted in RSC 1985, Appendix II, No (69) Roberts v Canada, [1989] 1 SCR 322 at 340, 57 DLR (4th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT