Bankruptcy and Insolvency for Transactional Lawyers: Panel Discussion

AuthorGeoffrey B. Morawetz (Moderator), Mr. Justice James M. Farley, John T. Evans, Murray A. McDonald, and Murray S. Gold
Pages27-45
Bankruptcy
and
Insolvency
for
Transactional Lawyers
Panel
Discussion
MR.
GEOFFREY
MORAWETZ:*
Today,
our
panel will
be
talking about bank-
ruptcy
and
insolvency
for
transactional lawyers.
It is
real-time
law and
a
real-time panel.
When
you
organize
a
panel months
in
advance
of a
program,
it has
both advantages
and
disadvantages.
The
advantage
is the
ability
to
invite panellists
who are
involved
in
files
that
are on the
front
page
of
the
business
news.
In
this case,
it was
expected that
the Air
Canada
restructuring, which started
on
April
1,
2003,
would have been complet-
ed
long
before
this program.
The Air
Canada
file
is not
finished
and it
is
now
sharing
front
page news with another large restructuring, name-
ly,
Stelco Inc.
On the
positive side,
the
panel
is
comprised
of
individuals
who
have demonstrated great
flexibility
and the
topics being discussed
are
very
current. However,
the
disadvantage
of
being
so
current
is
that
because
our
panellists have
not
finished
certain aspects
of
their work,
they
may be
somewhat constrained
in
making certain comments about
their ongoing
files.
However, they have indicated that they
are
free
to
talk
about many
of the
current issues that
are
being
faced
in
restructur-
ing
files
today.
The
Special Lectures
this
year
are
devoted
to
corporate
and
com-
mercial
law.
The two
significant
cases that
are
currently ongoing,
Air
Of
Goodmans
LLP.
27
28
PANEL
DISCUSSION
Canada
and
Stelco,
are,
for the
most
part,
corporate
transactions,
but,
obviously, they take
on
another level
of
complexity when
the
corporate
transaction
intersects
with insolvency.
The
result
is
quite clear.
The
bankruptcy
and
insolvency lawyer
of
yesterday
is now
referred
to as a
corporate restructuring lawyer.
We
have
four
speakers
on our
panel today.
The
first
to be
intro-
duced
is the
Honourable
Mr.
Justice James
Farley.
Mr.
Justice Farley
has
been
the
leading judge
on the
Commercial
List
since
its
inception
in
1991.
At the
current time,
he is
supervising
the
CCAA1
filings
of
Ivaco,
Slater Steel,
Air
Canada,
and
Stelco.
Mr.
Justice Farley will
be
talking
about inherent jurisdiction
as
well
as the
court supervised sales process.
Next
to Mr.
Justice Farley
is Mr.
John Evans
of
Osier, Hoskin
&
Har-
court LLP.
Mr.
Evans will
be
addressing
us on
directors'
liabilities,
a
very topical subject
in
view
of the
fact
that
the
Supreme Court
of
Cana-
da
will shortly
be
hearing
an
appeal
from
Quebec
in the
case
of
Peoples
Department
Store
v.
Wise2
where
the
issue
of
directors'
liability
in the
con-
text
of an
insolvent corporation
is the
central issue.
Mr.
Evans
has
been
representing Trinity Time Investments
in the Air
Canada restructuring.
We
will then hear
from
Mr.
Murray McDonald, president
of
Ernst
&
Young Inc.,
on the
issue
of
pensions
and
collective
agreements
in the
context
of an
insolvency.
Mr.
McDonald
is
currently extremely busy
as
Ernst
&
Young Inc.
is the
court-appointed
monitor
in the
CCAA filings
of
both
Air
Canada
and
Stelco.
Mr.
McDonald will also
be
talking about
negotiating
the
necessary balance
between
the
various
constituents
who
make claims
in the
restructuring process.
Finally,
Murray Gold
of
Koskie Minsky
LLP
will address
us in the
area
of
labour relations
and
collective agreements.
We
have
had
signifi-
cant developments
in
this area
of the law as,
very recently,
the
Ontario
Court
of
Appeal handed down
its
decision
in
TCT
Logistics3
and I
expect
that
Mr.
Gold will
be
providing commentary
on
this case.
In my
introductory remarks,
I
have made reference throughout
to
both
Air
Canada
and
Stelco.
Not
only
by
their sheer size
are
these enti-
ties dominating
the
insolvency landscape today,
but it
also
forces
us to
1
Companies'
Creditors
Arrangement
Act
(Canada),
R.S.C.
1985,
c.
C-36
[CCAA].
2
Peoples
Department
Stores
Inc.
(Trustee
of)
v.
Wise
(2003),
41
C.B.R.
(4th)
225
(Que.
C.A.). Note appeal
dismissed
with costs
on
October
29,
2004
at
[2004]
S.C.J.
No. 64.
3
GMAC
Commercial
Credit
Corp.
-
Canada
v.
T.C.T.
Logistics
Inc.
(2004),
48
C.B.R.
(4th)
256
(Ont.
C.A.)
[TCT
Logistics].

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT