Citizenship Status

AuthorJamie Chai Yun Liew; Donald Galloway
Pages436-467
436
CHAPTER 13
CITIZENSHIP STATUS
A. INTRODUCTION
This chapter outlines a brief history of the development of Canadian
citizenship law and then examines the criteria for obtaining citizen-
ship, the rights and responsibilities that attach, and the processes by
which one may lose the legal status that signif‌ies full membership in
our national community.
B. THE EMERGENCE OF CANADIAN
CITIZENSHIP
As explained in Chapter 1, until 1947, the position of Canada within
the British empire determined that the basic legal status enjoyed by
Canadians was that of British subject. In the nineteenth century, the
Dominion Parliament, acting under its constitutional authority over
aliens and naturalization,1 had enacted various Naturalization Acts
which provided that individuals who swore allegiance to the monarch
could become “local” British subjects; it had not, however, undertaken
to identify a local citizenry. Indeed, as Mervyn Jones has argued, be-
1 Constitution Ac t, 1867 (UK), 30 & 31 Vict, c 3, s 91(25), reprinted in RSC 1985,
Appendix II, No 5.
Citizenship Status437
fore the enactment of the Statute of Westminster2 in 1931, the Canadian
government probably did not have the authority to amend the law of
nationality that accorded the status of British subject to individuals
born in a territory of the British empire.3
Nevertheless, the Dominion Parliament introduced the concept
of citizenship into Canadian law in 1910. The Immigration Act of that
year made reference to citizens as one group of individuals who were
entitled to enter and remain in Canada even if they belonged to a pro-
hibited class. The other group with the entitlement was those with
Canadian domicile.4
The Act def‌ined a citizen as (a) a person born in Canada who had
not become an alien; (b) a British subject domiciled in Canada; or (c) a
person naturalized in Canada not having lost domicile or become an
alien.5 There was no need for the drafters of the legislation to have
used the term citizen for its limited purpose of identifying who had
rights to enter and remain in Canada. They could easily have framed
the legislation to include the various subgroups without introducing
the more generic term citizen. Clive Parry, however, has suggested that
one can discern an underlying intent of the Canadian Parliament to as-
sert its authority to identify individuals as Canadian citizens while not
threatening a confrontation with the Imperial Parliament in London.6
This was, in other words, an early intimation of what was to follow. Al-
though it did not displace the status of British subject, citizenship had
entered the legal lexicon.
The Immigration Act was later supplemented by the Canadian Nationals
Act,7 but again, the legislation was not a grandiose assertion of sover-
eignty; the sole purpose in def‌ining Canadian nationals was to allow
Canada to be represented at the International Court of Justice (the rule
of the Court was that a country could nominate only its own nationals
as judges).
Not until after the Second World War, did the Canadian Parliament
recognize more abstract and fundamental reasons for formalizing the
status of citizenship. Redef‌ining the relationship between the state and
the people came to be regarded as a way of promoting national unity
and social cohesion. The idea of personal allegiance to the monarch
2 Statute of Westminster,(1931) (UK), 22 & 23 Geo V, c 4.
3 J Mervyn Jone s, British Nationalit y Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956) at 87.
4 Immigration Act, SC 1910, c 27, s 3.
5 Ibid, s 2.
6 Cl ive Parry, Nationality and Citizenship Laws of the Commo nwealth and of the
Republic of Ireland (London: St evens and Sons, 1957) at 451.
7 Canadian Nationals Act, SC 1910, c 4.
IMMIGRATION LAW438
was replaced by the underlying notion that a set of common bonds
united each individual with others who held the same status. In the
legal imagination, the sovereignty of the citizenry replaced the sover-
eignty of the monarch.
The Canadian Citizenship Act, enacted in 1946 but which came into
force in 1947, maintained many of the distinctions that had been rec-
ognized at common law.8 Thus, a person born outside Canada took the
citizenship of the father unless he was born out of wedlock in which
case he took the citizenship of the mother. In addition, the Act applied
retrospectively to individuals who were born before it came into force.
It did not, however, make mention of the def‌inition of citizenship found
in the 1910 Immigration Act. Many of those whom it made citizens al-
ready had that status. The earlier def‌inition began to lose its relevance
as, from this point onwards, immigration legislation used the 1947 Act
as its reference point.
Signif‌icant complexities resulted from the 1947 Act. For example,
an illegitimate child born overseas to a Canadian father serving in the
military forces during the Second World War and coming to Canada
shortly after the war was not recognized as a Canadian citizen even
though he became domiciled in Canad a.9 Persons born outside Canada
after the Act came into force became citizens only if their birth was
registered within two years. Such individuals would lose their status
unless they made a declaration of retention within a year of attaining
the age of twenty-one. These and similar measures created room for
many to slip between cracks and unwittingly lose or not gain citizen-
ship. Moreover, although holding multiple nationalities was initially
permitted, this rule was soon amended to strip Canadians of citizen-
ship if they (or their father, if they were children) acquired citizenship
elsewhere. A generation of what came to be known as “lost Canadians”
was created.
Eventually, a new Citizenship Act was passed in 1977, which ad-
dressed some of these anomalies.10 This Act has remained the corner-
stone of today’s law and has undergone a number of revisions. One
major change was to consolidate citizen classes and declare natur-
alized and native-born citizens equal in terms of their entitlements,
powers, rights, and privileges, as well as their obligations, duties, and
liabilities.11 In the last decade, we have seen a number of amendments
to this Act, many introduced to remedy past unfairness. In 2009, the
8 Canadian Citizenship Act , SC 1946, c 15 [1947 Act].
9 Taylor v Canada (Minister of Citizenship an d Immigration),2007 FCA 349.
10Citizenship Act,SC 1974-75-76, c 108; RSC 1985, cC-29.
11Ibid.

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT