Defining National Security

AuthorCraig Forcese
ProfessionFaculty of Law, Common Law. University of Ottawa
Pages3-13
3
CHA PTER 1
DEFINING
NATIONAL SECURITY
This is a book about the law governi ng the Canadian state’s response
to serious crises; t hat is, events that jeopardize it s “national security.”
“National security” i s a term fami liar to most people. A search of Can-
ada News stand — an electronic archive of stories drawn from Canad-
ian newspapers — suggests that the words “national security” appeared
23,065 times in articles between September 11, 20 01 and January 2007.
During an equivalent period of time prior to September 11, 2001, the
phrase occurred just 8,313 times. This is not a scientif‌ic survey. It does,
however, point to the prevalence — and increased prominence — of the
concept in popular discourse.
And yet, despite it s ubiquity, the expression “national security”
does not lend itself to precise def‌initions. As noted in a 2002 think-tank
report, “the term national security is used frequently to refer to matter s
ranging from domest ic or internal security through to international
security, but is seldom def‌ined.”1 This paradox obliges a careful attempt
in this introduction to def‌ine the project of thi s book, before mapping
its content.
1 W.D. Macnamara & Ann Fit z-Gerald, “A National Securit y Framework for Can-
ada” (2002) 3:10 Polic y Matters at 7.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT