Evidence

AuthorM.H. Ogilvie
Pages197-206
Chapter
Seven
Evidence
A.
INTRODUCTION
Telling
the
truth,
no
matter
the
consequences,
is an
ideal propounded
by
many
religions,
often
backed
by the
threat
of
ultimate sanctions
to be
determined
by God who is
presented
as a
rewarder
of
truth
and an
avenger
of
falsehood.
For
Jews, Christians,
and
Muslims,
the
religious
obligation
to
tell
the
truth
is
found
in the
Ninth
Commandment,1
and the
Anglo-Canadian
common
law
reflects
both that injunction
and the
divine
sanction that backs
it in a
number
of
rules
of
evidence.
Two of
these have
particular bearing
on the law
relating
to
religious institutions. Originally,
the
common
law
required
all
evidence
to be
given under oath
on the
assumption that
no
person would tempt divine retribution
by
telling
lies.
Again,
the
common
law
after
the
Reformation
has
historically been reluc-
tant
to
grant
an
absolute privilege
to
protect communications made with-
in the
context
of
confession
to a
clergyperson
because
of the
overriding
policy
of
doing justice
in
this world
by
punishing
those
who
break
the
law
of
God, which once constituted
the
core
of the
criminal law.
While giving evidence under oath
and
privileged communications
are
the
evidentiary issues relating
to
religion most considered
by the
1
Exodus
20:16:
"You
shall
not
bear
false
witness
against
your
neighbour." (New
Revised
Standard
Version
-
N.R.S.V).
197

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT