Freedom of Expression

AuthorGeorge Verghese
Pages59-78
EXPRESSION
reedom
of
speech
and
expression
are not
gifts
of
government,
but
inherent
in
life.
Jefferson
said, "The
God
that
gave
us
life
gave
us
Lib-
erty
at the
same
time."
Communication makes community
and is the
most
powerful
instrument
of
socialization. Indeed, language
is no
more
than
the
codified
memory
of
given societies
as
they evolve, each
word
sym-
bolizing
a
particular shared experience. Freedom
of
expression
is an
inher-
ent
human
right
because
it
exists,
and not
because
it was
enunciated
in the
Human
Rights
Charter
in
1948
or in any
other
instrument, national
or
international, either
before
or
since.
Freedom
of
expression
is a
vital basis
of
society
as it is the
means
by
which
the
citizen holds accountable
all in
authority. This
is
particularly true
in
a
democratic society
in
which
freedom
of
expression constitutes
the
orga-
nizing
principle around which public opinion (which
is but a
crystallization
of
the
freely
expressed wishes
of the
people) bears
on, and
prevails over,
all
aspects
of
governance.
The
perpetual importance
of
freedom
of
expression
is
particularly evident
in the
communications revolution
of the
contempo-
rary
information age. People
now
have access
to the
instant, global contact
that
accompanies
the
marvels
and
dangers
of
surfing
in
cyberspace.
This
was not
always
so.
Exceptions apart, ready acceptance
of
freedom
of
expression
is
relatively
recent.
After
all, information
is
power.
Down
the
millennia, kings
and
tyrants have sought
to
control information,
and
deny
it
to
others,
for
fear
of
being challenged. Information
has
traditionally been
divided between Caesar
and
God, with
the
priestly class playing
the
latter
role. Until
the
Renaissance, education
in
Europe
was
controlled
by the
clergy
who
thereby retained
a
cosy
monopoly
over power. Galileo
was
for-
mally exculpated
of
heresy
by the
Pope only
a few
years ago, even though
59
F
FREEDOH
OF
BY GEORGE VERGHESE
the
world
had
long accepted that
the
earth revolves around
the sun and the
scientific
progress associated with this notion.
Church
and
state have gone hand
in
hand
in
most societies
and
civili-
zations throughout
the
world.
The
Reformation brought about
a
divorce
between
the two in
Europe.
But
fundamentalism
in
various garbs
is
still
seen
in
many parts
of the
world, including
the
United States.
It
is no
surprise that
the
Renaissance
was
propelled
by the
invention
of
the
printing press
and
movable type.
The
publication
of
books, journals, newspa-
pers,
and a
whole series
of
inventions sped communications between people.
The
telegraph, telephone, wire services, rotary press, mass-circulation papers,
and
radio were precursors
to
television,
the
integrated
chip,
modern
telecom-
munications with switching devices, computers, satellites, data networks,
and
the
Internet.
The
transformation
has
been extraordinary.
At its
heart
lie
com-
munication technologies whose speed
of
development
reflects
the
growing
volume
of
expeditious
and
relatively inexpensive communication.
I
was a
member
of the
McBride Commission,
set up by the
United
Nations Educational,
Scientific
and
Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
in
1977
to
consider
the
changing
face
of
global communications. Decoloni-
zation
was
nearing completion, developing societies were
on the
move,
and the
consolidation
of the
European Economic Community presaged
the
beginning
of a new
thrust towards globalization.
The
communications
revolution
was
gathering momentum,
and the
question posed
to the
Com-
mission
was how to
ensure freedom
of
expression
in the
future.
Despite
global
consultation
and the
availability
of the
best expertise, none envis-
aged
the
scale
and
rapidity
of the
technological transformation that
has
since been
effected.
Many
Voices,
One
W
orld
was
published
in
1979, just
two
decades ago,
but
seemingly aeons since.
In
1977,
the
world
saw the
emergence
of
conflict
between
a
"free"
and
"balanced"
flow of
information. That
was
perhaps inevitable
at the
height
of
the
Cold War.
The
wide and, many
feared,
growing information
gap
between North
and
South
led to
concerns about
neo-colonialism,
cultural
hegemony (which even
the
French protested during
the final
GATT
nego-
tiations
on the
Uruguay round,
and the
Quebecois perhaps still
do),
and
the
deepening
of a new
global divide between haves
and
have-nots. While
a
North-South
gap is not
without substance, there
is a
north-south divide
within,
as
much
as
between,
all
countries.
The
concept
of
sovereignty
is by no
means dead, even
if
some proclaim
it
obsolescent.
The
idea
of
government
is,
however, yielding
to a
broader sense
of
governance
as
populations, nongovernment agencies, corporate
and
trans-
ESSAYS
ON THE
MEANING
OF
FREEDOM
OF
EXPRESSION
60

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT