Hypnosis or hocus-pocus?

AuthorMitchell, Teresa
PositionBench Press

The Supreme Court of Canada recently ruled that evidence obtained by hypnosis is, in most cases, too unreliable to use. The case involved a man convicted of second-degree murder. Critical to his conviction was evidence obtained from a witness by hypnosis. The Court decided in a six to three decision that hypnosis evidence and its impact on human memory are not well enough understood for such testimony to be reliable in a court of law. It noted that studies of hypnosis are either inconclusive or draw attention to the fact that hypnosis can, in some circumstances, result in the distortion...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT