Mergers'/Amalgamations and Statutory Plans of Arrangement

AuthorChristopher C. Nicholls
ProfessionFaculty of Law, University of Western Ontario
Pages85-103
85
CHA PTER 4
“MERGERS”/
AMALGAMATIONS
AND STATUTORY PLANS
OF ARR ANGEMENT
A. INT RODUC TION
As discussed in Chapter 1, when parties enter into a “friendly” or ne-
gotiated transaction, they may choose a deal structure t hat best accom-
modates their respective interests. Two forms of share transaction that
may be chosen by friendly “merger” par ties in Canada (in addition
to structuring t he deal as a takeover bid, as discussed in Chapters 5
through 7) are amalgamations and plans of arrangement.1
B. AMALGAMATION
1) Legal Effect of Amalgamation
The legal concept of “amalgamation” in Canada involves the fusion of
two or more amalgamating corp orations to become a single entity—the
1 The word merger, although regula rly used by lawyers and i nvestment bankers in
Canada, i s not a term of art either in Can adian corporate or Canad ian secur-
ities law. The word is used in t he Canadian Competit ion Act but in a very broad
sense th at is not intended to connote any legally un ique form of transaction
for corporate law pur poses. See Chris topher C. Nicholls, Corporate Finance and
Canadian Law (Toronto: Carswel l, 2000) at 297.
MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS86
“amalga mated corp oration.”2 The Supreme Court of Canada has fam-
ously described the theory underlying the Canadi an concept of cor-
porate amalgamation by draw ing the analogy of “a river formed by the
conf‌luence of two streams, or the creation of a single rope th rough the
intertwining of strands.”3
This legal effect differs from the Delaware corporate law concept of
a “merger.” In Delaware, the merger of two or more corporations essen-
tially result s in the continuation of one of the constituent corporations,
into which the other constituent corporations are merged.4 (The Delaware
corporate law trans action that appears to be closer conceptually to the
Canadian concept of amalgamation is “consolidation.”)5 Canadian amal-
gamation does not simply involve the continuation of one of the amal-
gamating corporations, even t hough the newly formed amalgamated
corporation is permitted to adopt the name of any of the amalgamating
corporat ions.6
The legal effect of a corporate amalgamation is notional ly to con-
tinue the existence of each of the predecessor (amalgamating) corpora-
tions through the new (amalgamated) corporation. Thus, all of the
property of the amalgam ating corporations becomes the property of the
amalga mated corporation.7 Equally important, all liabilities—includ-
ing any existin g causes of action—are unaffected by the am algamation.8
2 See, for example, Cana da Business Corporations Act, s . 181 [CBCA]; Alberta Busi-
ness Corporations A ct, s. 181 [ABCA]; British Columbia Bu siness Corporations
Act, s. 269 [BCBCA]; The Corporations Act (Man itoba), s. 175(1)[MCA]; New
Brunsw ick Business Corporations Act, c. B-9.1, s. 120 [NBBCA]; Newfoundland
and Labrador Corp orations Act, s. 288 [NLCA]; Nova Scotia Companies Act, s.
134 [NSCA]; Ontario Business Corporatio ns Act, s. 174 [OBCA]; Prince Edward
Island Companies A ct, s. 77(1) [PEICA]; Saskatchewan Bu siness Corporations
Act, s. 175 [SBCA]; Northwest Territor ies Business Corporations Act, s. 183
[NWBCA]; Nunavut Business Cor porations Act, s. 183 [NuBCA]; Yukon Business
Corporations Act, s. 183 [YBCA].
3 R. v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Cor p., [1975] 1 S.C.R. 411 at 421.
4 Delaware General Corporatio n Law, Delaware C ode, Title 8, Chapter 1, s. 251(a).
5 Ibid.
6 See, for example, Canada Bus iness Corporations Regulatio ns, 2001, s. 31(2).
7 CBCA, s. 186(b); ABCA, s. 186(b); BCBCA, s. 282(1)(g); MCA, s. 180(b);
NBBCA, s. 125(b); NLCA, s. 294(1)(b); NSCA, s. 134(12); OBCA, s. 179(b);
PEICA, s. 77(4); SBCA, s. 180(b); NWBC A, s. 188(b); NuBCA, s. 188(b); YBCA,
s. 188(b).
8 CBCA, ss. 186(c) & (d); ABCA, ss. 186(c) & (d); BCBCA, ss. 282(1)(h)–(j);
MCA, ss. 180(c) & (d); NBBCA, s. 125(b); NLCA, s s. 294(1)(c) & (d); NSCA, s.
134(12); OBCA, s. 179(b); PEICA, s. 77(4); SBCA, ss. 180(c) & (d); NWBCA, ss.
188(c) & (d); NuBCA, ss. 188(c) & (d); YBCA, ss. 188(c) & (d).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT