Representation and Warranty

AuthorJohn D. McCamus
Pages728-741
728
CHAP TER 18
REPRESENTATION AND
WA R R A N T Y
A. I NTRODUC TION
As we have seen in Chapter 10, a variety of remedies are available to an
individual who is induced into an ag reement by a misrepresentation.
Whether the misrepresentation is fraudulently or innocently false, the
misrepresentee may be able to rescind the agreement. If the misstate-
ment is made fraudulently or negligently, the misrepresentor may be
liable in tort to a claim for compensatory damages. A further alter na-
tive form of relief may be available if a misrepresentation inducing a
contract can be character ized as being subject to an implicit undert ak-
ing that the representation is true. In such circumstances, it may be
possible to render that undertaking enforceable either as a collateral
contract that is subsidi ary to the mai n contract induced by the rep-
resentation or, indeed, as part of that main contract itself. In either
case, the falsity of the representation would constitute a breach of the
implicit undertaking and would give ri se to a claim for damages for
breach of contract. If the undertaki ng is a simple warranty th at the
statement is true, liability will be st rict and not dependent on a f‌inding
of fraud or negligence. The measure of damages in a claim for breach of
contract would be in the expectancy measure, a measure of relief that
is potentially more comprehensive than a compensatory award in tort
as it may include an element of the prof‌it that would have been secured

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT