Sentencing

AuthorNathan Baker
Pages209-212
CHAPTER
14
Sentencing
While
the
mandatory
minimums
relating
to
impaired
driving
apply
equally
to
both
drug-impaired
and
alcohol-impaired
driving
at
the
current
time,
the
amendments
that
are
expected
to
occur
shortly
will
have
some
effect
on
this.
The
elimination
of
the
availability
of
conditional
discharges
for
such
offences
will
give
a
greater
number
of
accused
an
incentive
to
fight
such
charges.
However,
given
the
unavailability
of
curative
dischar
ges
in
some
provinces
and
their
poor
uptake
in
other
areas,
this
may
have
little
effect
overall.
What
does
change
pursuant
to
the
new
amendments
is
the
ability
of
a
judge
to
impose
a
sentence
less
than
the
prescribed
minimums,
where
participation
in
rehabilitative
programming
occurs.
This
can
apply
to
either
or
both
of
the
fine
and
the
driving
prohibition
periods.
Although
the
availability
of
alcohol
interlock
programs
and
the
ability
to
enroll
in
them
immediately
after
a
plea
may
encourage
many
first-time
alcohol-im
paired
drivers
to
plea
at
an
early
opportunity,
the
lack
of
such
programs
for
drug-impaired
drivers
may
encourage
participation
in
a
rehabilitative
program
to
avoid
a
longer
loss
of
licence.
The
impact
of
provincial
sus
pensions
and
the
availability
of
such
programming
province-to-province
will
have
significant
impact
once
the
provincial
and
territorial
govern
ments
have
their
say.
The
imposition
of
a
mandatory
driving
federally
imposed
criminal
pro
hibition
pending
completion
of
such
a
program
is
offset
to
some
degree
209

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT