The Retainer
Author | Marshall A. Swadron |
Pages | 77-93 |
TheRetainer
MarshallASwadron*
Thispaperaddressestheretainerofthelawyerengagedtoactonbehalf
ofthe olderclient incapacityrelatedmaers Itconsidersthe dierent
means bywhich the lawyermay beengaged including appointments
undersectionoftheSubstituteDecisionsAct SDA It also consid-
ersconictsofinteresttheneedtoensu reindependenceandtheroleof
counselW hilethi spaperrelates tothe olderclientthe principlesdis -
cussedmaybeappliedmorebroadlyto otherclientsincapacityrelated
maers
Capacityrelatedmaersareconcernedwithwhetherapersoniscapable
ofmakingdecisionsorintheeventofincapacitywhoshouldbemaking
decisionsa ndhowt heyshouldbe madeIn Ontario suchproceedings
OfSwadronAssociatesinTorontoTheauthorwouldliketothankMercedesPerez
alsoofSwadronAssociatesforherassistanceinpreparingthispaperportionsof
whichhavebeenadaptedfromtheauthorspriorpaperRepresentingtheIncapable
ClientinCapacityProceedingsdeliveredatthethAnnualEstatesandTrusts
SummitoftheLawSocietyofUpperCanadaheldinTorontoonNovember
LawyerswithSwadronAssociatesalsoactedinsomecapacityinthecasescitedat
footnotesand
SOcSDA].
Theprinciplesint hepaperdonotapplytoolderclientsinotherconte xtshowever
asageisnotadetermin antofcapacity
MAS
are conducted in the Superior Court of Justice under the SDA and before
theConsentandCapacityBoardundertheHealthCareConsentAct
HCCA
Where the rights and obligations of an incapable person are deter-
mined in othercontexts representation generally occurs througha liti-
gation guardian designated representative or similar devices The
signicance ofthe role ofcounsel in capacityrelatedmaersi sthat the
lawyerclientrelationsh ipisu nmediatedalthough itmayst illbe neces-
sarytodealwithothersinre spectofthenancialaspect softheretainer
Whenconsidering thescopeoft heretainerabrightlineshouldbe
drawnbetweencapacityrelatedmaersandmaersaectingtheclients
propertyAlawyermustbe satisedastoa clientscapacitytomanage
property beforeaccepting a retainerto act inrespec tof thatpropert y
Should both types of issues present t hemselves in the same retainer
theproper tyrelatedissues mustbe deferredunt ilthe capacityrelated
issuesareresolvedsubjecttointerimordersofthecourt
This sectionof thepapercon sidersdierentmeans bywhich alawyer
maybeengagedi ncludingengagementbythe clientbya guardian or
aorneyor byothers Italso considersappointments ofcounsel under
sectionoftheSDA andsectionoftheHCCA.
It should be made clear at the outset of this section that regardless
ofthe manner inwh icha lawyeris retained orwhoisresponsible for
thenancia laspectsofthere taineroreveninsomecaseswhois pay-
ingthefee sthelawyersonlyclient istheolderpersonIn thisregard
itmaerslile whohasbroughtt helawyerto thedancea slongast he
lawyerleaveswiththerightpartner
Directengagementofa lawyerbytheolderclientis consistentwiththe
personalautonomyanddignityoftheclientThereisnocasethatestab-
lishest hecapacity thresholdrequired toreta ina lawyerin acapacity
relatedproceedingCourtshaveheldhoweverthatthetestsforcapacity
HealthCareConsentActSOcHCCASchedA
RulesofCivilProcedureRRORegr
ImmigrationAppealDivisionRulesSORsundertheImmigrationand
RefugeeProtectionActSCc
SeeforexampletheAbsentees ActR SOcA
To continue reading
Request your trial