The united states experience with competition class action certification: a comment

AuthorSpencer Weber Waller
ProfessionAssociate Dean for Faculty Research, Professor, and Director of the Institute for Consumer Antitrust Studies, Loyola University Chicago School of Law
Pages209-217
THE
UNITED
STATES
EXPERIENCE
WITH
COMPETITION
CLASS
ACTION
CERTIFICATION:
A
COMMENT
Spencer
Weber
Waller*
A.
INTRODUCTION
The
symposium hosted
by the
University
of
Western Ontario
on 1
April
2005
was a
wonderful opportunity
to
think comparatively about
the
issues involved
in the
certification
of
class actions
and to
reflect
on the
American
experience
in
this
area.
It was
also
an
opportunity
to
consider
what lessons Americans
can
provide
to
Canada
and
other jurisdictions
implementing forms
of
aggregate litigation
in
competition cases,
and
what lessons Americans
can
learn
from
the
experience
of
other jurisdic-
tions
starting
fresh
down
this
path. Professors Robert
Klonoff
and
William
Page
have written
two
excellent articles which
are
broadly consistent
in
their similar explicit
and
implicit suggestions about taking
the
question
of
class
certification
seriously. Both articles present road maps
for the
conscientious judge
in
these types
of
cases
and are to be
commended
for
their
efforts
to
bring clarity
and
honesty
to
these critical decisions, these
moments
of
truth
in the
litigation process.
My aim in
this comment
is to
explore
further
their suggestions,
to
look beyond
the
procedural aspects
of
class
certification,
and to
reflect
on the
larger substantive issues
of
antitrust
law
lying just below
their
surface
in
both
the
United States
and
Canada, namely, whether
and how to
permit indirect purchasers
to
recover
in
price-fixing cases.
Associate Dean
for
Faculty Research, Professor,
and
Director
of the
Institute
for
Consumer
Antitrust
Studies,
Loyola
University
Chicago
School
of
Law.
Thanks
to
Anthony Sebok
and
Michael Kaufman
for
their
helpful
comments
on an
earlier
version
of
this
comment
and to the
organizers
of the
symposium
for a
splendid
day at
Western
Law.
209

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT