Zakreski v. Zakreski, (1981) 10 Sask.R. 1 (UFC)
Judge | Dickson, J. |
Case Date | January 20, 1981 |
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Citations | (1981), 10 Sask.R. 1 (UFC) |
Zakreski v. Zakreski (1981), 10 Sask.R. 1 (UFC)
MLB headnote and full text
Zakreski v. Zakreski
(No. 23)
Indexed As: Zakreski v. Zakreski
Saskatchewan Unified Family Court
Judicial Centre of Saskatoon
Dickson, J.
January 20, 1981.
Summary:
This case arose out of an application by a wife for maintenance and for the division of matrimonial property under the Matrimonial Property Act.
The Saskatchewan Unified Family Court awarded the wife maintenance of $250.00 per month. In addition the wife was given possession of the matrimonial home and the balance of the matrimonial property was divided equally between the husband and wife.
Family Law - Topic 2283
Maintenance of wives and children - Desertion defined - The Saskatchewan Unified Family Court referred to a definition of desertion - See paragraph 4.
Family Law - Topic 875
Husband and wife - Property rights arising from marriage, distribution orders - Statutes requiring equal division, exceptions - The Saskatchewan Unified Family Court stated that matrimonial property should be divided equally between a husband and wife notwithstanding illness or greater contribution to the acquisition of assets by one of the spouses - See paragraph 15.
Family Law - Topic 868
Husband and wife - Property rights arising from marriage, distribution orders - Matrimonial Property Act - Property subject to distribution - The Saskatchewan Unified Family Court held that a spouse's pension fund did not constitute matrimonial property available for distribution but was an asset from which maintenance obligations could be paid - See paragraph 17.
Family Law - Topic 875
Husband and wife - Property rights arising from marriage, distribution orders - Statutes requiring equal division, exceptions - The Saskatchewan Unified Family Court made an offsetting award to a wife where the husband's pension fund (a maintenance asset) was subject to contingencies which could result in the wife being unable to share in the asset - See paragraphs 21 and 22.
Family Law - Topic 2484
Maintenance of wives - Awards - Periodic payments - A husband earned $21,719.00 per annum and the wife, age 55, had an income of $400.00 per month (apart from her income from her share of the matrimonial assets) - The Saskatchewan Unified Family Court ordered the husband to pay the wife $250.00 per month.
Family Law - Topic 865
Husband and wife - Property rights arising from marriage, distribution orders - Matrimonial home - The husband deserted the wife - In such circumstances the Saskatchewan Unified Family Court gave possession of the matrimonial home to the wife until further order - See paragraph 22.
Conflict of Laws - Topic 4926
Property - Situs of personalty - Pension fund - The Saskatchewan Unified Family Court stated the situs of a pension is the residence of the pensioner - See paragraph 18.
Cases Noticed:
Rutherford v. Rutherford, 14 R.F.L.(2d) 41, refd to. [para. 17].
Middleton v. Middleton, 3 Sask.R. 33; 15 R.F.L.(2d) 251, refd to. [para. 18].
Statutes Noticed:
Matrimonial Property Act, S.S. 1979, c. M-6.1, sect. 20 [para. 13].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Power on Divorce (3d), vol. 1, p. 98 [para. 4].
Counsel:
D. Kendall, for the applicant;
M. Cherneskey, for the respondent.
This application was heard by DICKSON, J., of the Saskatchewan Unified Family Court.
The judgment of DICKSON, J., was delivered at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, on January 20, 1981.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
MacDougald v. MacDougald, (1988) 86 N.B.R.(2d) 308 (CA)
...refd to. [para. 9]. Isbister v. Isbister (1981), 11 Man.R.(2d) 353; 22 R.F.L.(2d) 234 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 9]. Zakreski v. Zakreski (1981), 10 Sask.R. 1; 21 R.F.L.(2d) 153 (U.F.C.), refd to. [para. Clarke v. Clarke (1986), 72 N.S.R.(2d) 387; 173 A.P.R. 387; 1 R.F.L.(3d) 29 (C.A.), refd t......
-
McAlister v. McAlister, (1982) 41 A.R. 277 (QB)
...v. Rutherford, [1981] 6 W.W.R. 485, affing. [1980] 2 W.W.R. 330, consd. [paras. 63, 91]. Zakreski v. Zakreski, [1981] 3 W.W.R. 33; 10 Sask.R. 1, consd. [para. Ronning v. Ronning, 27 R.F.L.(2d) 1, consd. [para. 70]. St. Germain v. St. Germain, 14 R.F.L.(2d) 186, not folld. [para. 77]. Statut......
-
Partington v. Partington, (1982) 18 Sask.R. 172 (UFC)
...but that the wife's share was limited to the value accumulated during cohabitation (see paragraph 8). Cases Noticed: Zakreski v. Zakreski, 10 Sask.R. 1; 21 R.F.L.(2d) 153, refd to. [para. Morrell v. Morrell, 15 Sask.R. 307; 24 R.F.L.(2d) 455, refd to. [para. 8]. Statutes Noticed: Matrimonia......
-
Morrell v. Morrell, (1981) 15 Sask.R. 307 (QB)
...in the value of the pension fund as of the date cohabitation ceased - See paragraphs 7 to 10. Cases Noticed: Zakreski v. Zakreski (1981), 10 Sask.R. 1; 21 R.F.L.(2d) 153, appld. [para. Rutherford v. Rutherford, 14 R.F.L.(2d) 41; [1980] 2 W.W.R. 330; addendum [1980] 6 W.W.R. 206; 18 R.F.L.(2......
-
MacDougald v. MacDougald, (1988) 86 N.B.R.(2d) 308 (CA)
...refd to. [para. 9]. Isbister v. Isbister (1981), 11 Man.R.(2d) 353; 22 R.F.L.(2d) 234 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 9]. Zakreski v. Zakreski (1981), 10 Sask.R. 1; 21 R.F.L.(2d) 153 (U.F.C.), refd to. [para. Clarke v. Clarke (1986), 72 N.S.R.(2d) 387; 173 A.P.R. 387; 1 R.F.L.(3d) 29 (C.A.), refd t......
-
McAlister v. McAlister, (1982) 41 A.R. 277 (QB)
...v. Rutherford, [1981] 6 W.W.R. 485, affing. [1980] 2 W.W.R. 330, consd. [paras. 63, 91]. Zakreski v. Zakreski, [1981] 3 W.W.R. 33; 10 Sask.R. 1, consd. [para. Ronning v. Ronning, 27 R.F.L.(2d) 1, consd. [para. 70]. St. Germain v. St. Germain, 14 R.F.L.(2d) 186, not folld. [para. 77]. Statut......
-
Partington v. Partington, (1982) 18 Sask.R. 172 (UFC)
...but that the wife's share was limited to the value accumulated during cohabitation (see paragraph 8). Cases Noticed: Zakreski v. Zakreski, 10 Sask.R. 1; 21 R.F.L.(2d) 153, refd to. [para. Morrell v. Morrell, 15 Sask.R. 307; 24 R.F.L.(2d) 455, refd to. [para. 8]. Statutes Noticed: Matrimonia......
-
Morrell v. Morrell, (1981) 15 Sask.R. 307 (QB)
...in the value of the pension fund as of the date cohabitation ceased - See paragraphs 7 to 10. Cases Noticed: Zakreski v. Zakreski (1981), 10 Sask.R. 1; 21 R.F.L.(2d) 153, appld. [para. Rutherford v. Rutherford, 14 R.F.L.(2d) 41; [1980] 2 W.W.R. 330; addendum [1980] 6 W.W.R. 206; 18 R.F.L.(2......