in Case Law › Supreme Court of Canada
in vLex Canada

26000 results for Case Law › Supreme Court of Canada

  • vLex Rating
  • Reference re Environmental Management Act, 2020 SCC 1
  • Canada Post Corp. v. Canadian Union of Postal Workers, 2019 SCC 67

    [1]                              This appeal concerns an application for judicial review of a decision by the Occupational Health and Safety Tribunal Canada (“OHSTC”). The administrative decision maker was tasked with interpreting a provision of the Canada Labour Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. L‑2  (“Code ”), to determine whether the employer, Canada Post Corporation (“Canada Post”), complied with its...

  • Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65

    [1]                              This appeal and its companion cases (see Bell Canada v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 SCC 66), provide this Court with an opportunity to re-examine its approach to judicial review of administrative decisions.

  • Bell Canada v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 SCC 66

    [1]                              For more than 40 years, the Super Bowl game, which is played in the United States, had been broadcast in Canada in accordance with the “simultaneous substitution” regime, which was set out in various regulations made under the Broadcasting Act, S.C. 1991, c. 11 . As a result, Canadians were prevented from viewing high-profile commercials that were aired in the U.S.

  • Canada (Attorney General) v. British Columbia Investment Management Corp., 2019 SCC 63

    [1]                              This appeal and cross-appeal consider when the activities of a provincial Crown corporation may be taxed by the federal government. It requires this Court to evaluate the scope of the intergovernmental immunity from taxation set out in s. 125  of the Constitution Act, 1867 , and whether agreements entered into by two levels of government to pay the equivalent of “t

  • R. v. Collin, 2019 SCC 64
  • Yared v. Karam, 2019 SCC 62

    [1]                              The appellants, Mr. Ramy and Rody Yared, are the liquidators of the succession of their sister, Ms. Taky Yared, who passed away in April 2015. In July 2016, they sought a declaration in Superior Court that the value of the family residence should be included in the division of the family patrimony. At the time of Ms. Yared’s death, this residence was held under a...

  • International Air Transport Association v. Instrubel, N.V., 2019 SCC 61
  • R. v. Resolute FP Canada Inc., 2019 SCC 60

    [1]                              In 1985, the Province of Ontario granted an indemnity (the “1985 Indemnity”) to Reed Ltd. and Great Lakes Forest Products Limited, both former owners of a pulp and paper mill located in Dryden, Ontario, as well as their successors and assigns, for “any damage, loss, event or circumstances, caused or alleged to be caused by or with respect to, either in whole or in

  • Kosoian v. Société de transport de Montréal, 2019 SCC 59

    [1]                              On an evening in May 2009, the appellant, Bela Kosoian, entered a subway station in order to travel to university. She took the descending escalator. Like many subway users, she did not hold the handrail. She leaned forward and rummaged through her bag. A police officer saw her and ordered her several times to hold the handrail. Ms. Kosoian refused to comply and...

  • Desgagnés Transport Inc. v. Wärtsilä Canada Inc., 2019 SCC 58

    [1]                              This appeal centres on a dispute between a Canadian shipping company located in Quebec, Desgagnés Transport Inc. (“TDI”), and a manufacturer and supplier of marine engines, Wärtsilä Nederland B.V. and its Canadian division, Wärtsilä Canada Inc. (collectively “Wärtsilä”). The action arises out of the failure of engine parts — a new bedplate, a reconditioned...

  • Montréal (Ville) v. Octane Stratégie inc., 2019 SCC 57

    [1]                              This case consolidates two files relating to an unpaid invoice for $82,898.63 for the production of a launch event for the appellant Ville de Montréal (“City”) more than 10 years ago. The issues raised in these appeals go beyond, however, the mere payment of that invoice. The Court is called upon to determine whether the principles of Quebec civil law concerning...

  • R. v. K.J.M., 2019 SCC 55

    [1]                              On April 12, 2015, the appellant, a “young person” under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, S.C. 2002, c. 1  (“YCJA ”), was charged with various offences arising out of a fight in which he stabbed another youth in the face and the back of the head with a box cutter. He maintained his innocence, claiming self-defence. On November 9, 2016, almost 19 months after...

  • R. v. Shlah, 2019 SCC 56
  • R. v. Javanmardi, 2019 SCC 54

    [1]                              Mitra Javanmardi opened a naturopathic clinic in Quebec in 1985. She has a degree in science from McGill University, a doctorate in naturopathic medicine from the National College of Naturopathic Medicine in Portland, Oregon, and a related diploma which involved 500 hours of further courses. Ms. Javanmardi’s education included classes and clinical training about...

  • R. v. Friesen, to follow
  • Volkswagen Group Canada Inc. v. Association québécoise de lutte contre la pollution atmosphérique, 2019 SCC 53
  • R. v. Rafilovich, 2019 SCC 51

    [1]                              Do the proceeds of crime provisions of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46  (“Code ”), require courts to give with one hand, only to take away with the other? The appellant, Yulik Rafilovich, applied for and was returned funds that the state had initially seized from him as potential proceeds of crime, because he needed the funds to pay for his legal defence...

  • R. v. James, 2019 SCC 52
  • Threlfall v. Carleton University, 2019 SCC 50

    [1]                              On September 10, 2007, George Roseme, a political science professor who had retired from the respondent, Carleton University (“Carleton”), decided to go for a walk near his home. Tragically, he never returned. Despite the best efforts of rescuers, family and friends, he could not be found.

  • R.S. v. P.R., 2019 SCC 49

    [1]                              Three days. That short difference is the reason why the issue of the scope and application of the international lis pendens exception in Quebec private international law has come up in this case. This issue arises in the context of divorce proceedings between the parties in Belgium and in Quebec.

  • R. v. Kernaz, 2019 SCC 48
  • R. v. Poulin, 2019 SCC 47

    [1]                              Every person charged with an offence in Canada enjoys certain basic rights. One such right is contained in s. 11 (i) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms  (“Charter ”), which grants a person found guilty of an offence the right “to the benefit of the lesser punishment” “if the punishment . . . has been varied between the time of commission [of the...

  • R. v. M.R.H., 2019 SCC 46
  • Fleming v. Ontario, 2019 SCC 45

    [1]                              On May 24, 2009, officers of the Ontario Provincial Police (“O.P.P.”) arrested the appellant, Randolph (Randy) Fleming, in Caledonia, Ontario. He had committed no crime. He had broken no law. He was not about to commit any offence, harm anyone, or breach the peace. In essence, the O.P.P. officers claimed to have arrested Mr. Fleming for his own protection. The...

  • Denis v. Côté, 2019 SCC 44

    [1]                              In this case, the Court is considering rare interlocutory appeals in the criminal law context. The main appeal concerns the validity of a subpoena served on a journalist, namely the appellant, Marie‑Maude Denis, for the purpose of obtaining evidence in support of a motion for a stay of proceedings falling into the “residual” category described in R. v. Babos, 2014

  • Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. Teranet Inc., 2019 SCC 43

    [1]                              This appeal gives the Court its first opportunity to examine the scope and application of Crown copyright. The tools at our interpretive disposal are not only the usual principles of statutory interpretation, they also include extensive jurisprudence explaining how this Court has come to understand copyright law in the years since the Crown copyright provision was

  • Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey, 2019 SCC 42

    [1]                              The proposed representative plaintiff, Neil Godfrey, applied for certification of a class proceeding under the British Columbia Class Proceedings Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 50. The defendants manufacture Optical Disc Drives (“ODDs” — a memory storage device that uses laser light or electromagnetic waves near the light spectrum to read and/or record data on optical...

  • R. v. R.V., 2019 SCC 41

    [1]                              Sexual assault trials raise unique challenges in protecting the integrity of the trial and balancing the societal interests of both the accused and the complainant. Parliament and the courts have responded to these challenges by setting out rules of evidence tailored to this context. 

  • R. v. Stillman, 2019 SCC 40

    [1]                              Section 11 (f) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms  guarantees every person charged with an offence carrying a punishment of at least five years’ imprisonment the right to the benefit of a jury trial, “except in the case of an offence under military law tried before a military tribunal” (in French, “sauf s’il s’agit d’une infraction relevant de la...

  • Free signup to view additional results