1162740 Ontario Limited v. Pingue,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeHoy , van Rensburg , Roberts
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Citation2017 ONCA 583
Docket NumberC59933
Date10 July 2017

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 17, 2023 ' April 21, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 5, 2023
    ...of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 134, Rules of Civil Procedure, rr. 30.08(1)(a), 53.08(1), 1162740 Ontario Limited v. Pingue, 2017 ONCA 583, Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. Northbridge Indemnity ......
  • Digest: P.E.M.A. v S.L.A., 2018 SKQB 145
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • May 8, 2018
    ...s 16 Federal Child Support Guidelines, SOR/97-175, s 17 Rules Considered: QB Rule 5-39 Cases Considered: 1162740 Ontario Ltd. v Pingue, 2017 ONCA 583, 281 ACWS (3d) 80 A.M. v Ryan, [1997] 1 SCR 157, 143 DLR (4th) 1, [1997] 4 WWR 1 Beug v Schmidt, 2008 SKQB 380, 321 Sask R 102 Continental Ro......
  • Tridelta Investment Counsel Inc. v GTA Mixed-Use Developments GP Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 19, 2024
    ...of the plaintiffs is warranted in this case. See 1162740 Ontario Limited, et al v Pingue, et al., 2015 ONSC 587, at para. 14, aff'd 2017 ONCA 583, leave to appeal refused [2017] S.C.C.A. No. 368. The follow-up question in this case of whether funds were misappropriated, or just mismanaged, ......
  • 1217174 Ontario Ltd. v. 141608 Canada Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 22, 2017
    ...The description of a bare trust is not determinative of the legal substance of the relationship (1162740 Ontario Limited v. Pingue, 2017 ONCA 583, at paras. 7-8, leave to appeal to SCC requested); rather, there must be a consideration of the rights and duties involved (Pallot v. Douglas, 20......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • Tridelta Investment Counsel Inc. v GTA Mixed-Use Developments GP Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 19, 2024
    ...of the plaintiffs is warranted in this case. See 1162740 Ontario Limited, et al v Pingue, et al., 2015 ONSC 587, at para. 14, aff'd 2017 ONCA 583, leave to appeal refused [2017] S.C.C.A. No. 368. The follow-up question in this case of whether funds were misappropriated, or just mismanaged, ......
  • 1217174 Ontario Ltd. v. 141608 Canada Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 22, 2017
    ...The description of a bare trust is not determinative of the legal substance of the relationship (1162740 Ontario Limited v. Pingue, 2017 ONCA 583, at paras. 7-8, leave to appeal to SCC requested); rather, there must be a consideration of the rights and duties involved (Pallot v. Douglas, 20......
  • Fram Elgin Mills 90 Inc. v. Romandale Farms Limited et al.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 2, 2020
    ...wholly devoid of merit, abuse of process, and unnecessarily running up the costs of the litigation. 1162740 Ontario Limited v. Pingue, 2017 ONCA 583; Buccilli et al v. Pillitteri et al, 2013 ONSC 1537; and 1505986 Ont. Inc. v. Surma, 2010 ONSC 6956 [28] Romandale relies on these three cases......
  • 2023 ONCA 265,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...trial judge's exercise of her discretion in deciding whether to admit the Great West Life policy: 1162740 Ontario Limited v. Pingue, 2017 ONCA 583, at para. 15 While the trial judge did not explicitly refer to the test under r. 53.08(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, it is evident th......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 17, 2023 ' April 21, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 5, 2023
    ...of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 134, Rules of Civil Procedure, rr. 30.08(1)(a), 53.08(1), 1162740 Ontario Limited v. Pingue, 2017 ONCA 583, Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. Northbridge Indemnity ......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 10 – July 14, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 25, 2017
    ...Services Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.11, ss 39(1), (3), Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, r 7(4), (5) 1162740 Ontario Limited v. Pingue, 2017 ONCA 583 Keywords: Corporations, Shareholder Remedies, Evidence, Experts, Rules of Civil Procedure, r. 53.08, Offers to Settle, Substantial Indemnity Cost......
1 books & journal articles
  • Digest: P.E.M.A. v S.L.A., 2018 SKQB 145
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • May 8, 2018
    ...s 16 Federal Child Support Guidelines, SOR/97-175, s 17 Rules Considered: QB Rule 5-39 Cases Considered: 1162740 Ontario Ltd. v Pingue, 2017 ONCA 583, 281 ACWS (3d) 80 A.M. v Ryan, [1997] 1 SCR 157, 143 DLR (4th) 1, [1997] 4 WWR 1 Beug v Schmidt, 2008 SKQB 380, 321 Sask R 102 Continental Ro......