1247249 B.C. Ltd. v. 1098212 B.C. Ltd.
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Veenstra |
| Citation | 2022 BCSC 1230 |
| Docket Number | S92866 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 20 July 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
2024 BCSC 1830,
...and the plaintiffs' intended uses. 180 I find that the present circumstances are akin to those in 1247249 B.C. Ltd. v. 1098212 B.C. Ltd., 2022 BCSC 1230, where an investment property that the plaintiff intended to subdivide was found to be sufficiently unique to warrant an order for specifi......
-
Qi v Qin,
...and the plaintiffs' intended uses. 180 I find that the present circumstances are akin to those in 1247249 B.C. Ltd. v. 1098212 B.C. Ltd., 2022 BCSC 1230, where an investment property that the plaintiff intended to subdivide was found to be sufficiently unique to warrant an order for specifi......
-
Culos Development (1996) Inc. v Baytalan,
...the propriety of an order for specific performance: see Qi v. Qin, 2024 BCSC 1830 at para. 176; 1247249 B.C. Ltd. v. 1098212 B.C. Ltd., 2022 BCSC 1230 at paras. 73 I would add that in this case, involving as it did an OTP as distinct from a contract based entirely on pre-contractual “relian......
-
2025 BCSC 2143,
...contract to which the parties had agreed. Justice Veenstra's reasons for judgement are indexed at 1247249 B.C. Ltd. v. 1098212 B.C. Ltd., 2022 BCSC 1230. 14 Following the release of the reasons of Justice Veenstra, the seller initiated an appeal. However, that appeal was resolved by way of ......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
2024 BCSC 1830,
...and the plaintiffs' intended uses. 180 I find that the present circumstances are akin to those in 1247249 B.C. Ltd. v. 1098212 B.C. Ltd., 2022 BCSC 1230, where an investment property that the plaintiff intended to subdivide was found to be sufficiently unique to warrant an order for specifi......
-
Qi v Qin,
...and the plaintiffs' intended uses. 180 I find that the present circumstances are akin to those in 1247249 B.C. Ltd. v. 1098212 B.C. Ltd., 2022 BCSC 1230, where an investment property that the plaintiff intended to subdivide was found to be sufficiently unique to warrant an order for specifi......
-
Culos Development (1996) Inc. v Baytalan,
...the propriety of an order for specific performance: see Qi v. Qin, 2024 BCSC 1830 at para. 176; 1247249 B.C. Ltd. v. 1098212 B.C. Ltd., 2022 BCSC 1230 at paras. 73 I would add that in this case, involving as it did an OTP as distinct from a contract based entirely on pre-contractual “relian......
-
2025 BCSC 2143,
...contract to which the parties had agreed. Justice Veenstra's reasons for judgement are indexed at 1247249 B.C. Ltd. v. 1098212 B.C. Ltd., 2022 BCSC 1230. 14 Following the release of the reasons of Justice Veenstra, the seller initiated an appeal. However, that appeal was resolved by way of ......
Get Started for Free