1335333 Ontario Ltd. v. Lindop, [2004] O.T.C. 696 (SC)
Judge | MacKenzie, J. |
Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Case Date | August 12, 2004 |
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Citations | [2004] O.T.C. 696 (SC) |
1335333 Ont. Ltd. v. Lindop, [2004] O.T.C. 696 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2004] O.T.C. TBEd. AU.045
1335333 Ontario Limited v. Thomas Robert Lindop and Heidi Janet Lindop
(Court File No. 2690/02)
Indexed As: 1335333 Ontario Ltd. v. Lindop
Court of Ontario
Superior Court of Justice
MacKenzie, J.
August 12, 2004.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Evidence - Topic 221
Inferences and weight of evidence - Inferences - Inference from failure to cross-examine - See paragraphs 27 to 34.
Practice - Topic 5702
Judgments and orders - Summary judgments - Jurisdiction or when available or when appropriate - See paragraphs 1 to 35.
Practice - Topic 5720.1
Judgments and orders - Summary judgments - Stay of - See paragraph 36.
Practice - Topic 5854
Judgments and orders - Enforcement of judgments - Stay of - See paragraph 36.
Cases Noticed:
Guarantee Co. of North America v. Gordon Capital Corp., [1999] 3 S.C.R. 423; 247 N.R. 97; 126 O.A.C. 1; 178 D.L.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 21].
Ungerman (Irving) Ltd. et al. v. Galanis and Haut (1991), 50 O.A.C. 176; 4 O.R.(3d) 545 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 22].
Rozin v. Ilitchev et al. (2003), 175 O.A.C. 4; 66 O.R.(3d) 410 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 23].
Royal Bank of Canada v. Feldman (1995), 23 O.R.(3d) 798 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 26].
Hawrish v. Bank of Montreal, [1969] S.C.R. 515; 2 D.L.R.(3d) 600; 66 W.W.R.(N.S.) 673, refd to. [para. 28].
Bauer v. Bank of Montreal, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 102; 32 N.R. 191, refd to. [para. 28].
Adelaide Capital Corp. v. D.O.W.I. Limited Partnership, [1996] O.J. No. 935 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 31].
Counsel:
John C. Hubble, for the plaintiff;
Ronald S. Sleightholm, for the defendants.
This motion was heard before MacKenzie, J., of the Ontario Superior Court. The following decision was endorsed on the record and released on August 12, 2004.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial