2102908 Alberta Ltd v Intact Insurance Company,
| Judge | Antonio,Strekaf,Wakeling |
| Citation | 2023 ABCA 34 |
| Docket Number | 2203-0060AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 03 February 2023 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Paramount Resources Ltd v Chubb Insurance Company of Canada,
...subjective intentions is generally inadmissible. 126 Similarly, Strekaf JA dissenting in 2102908 Alberta Ltd v Intact Insurance Company, 2023 ABCA 34 described the jurisprudence as follows: [44] “An ambiguity exists where there are ‘two reasonable but differing interpretations......
-
Will A Flood Exclusion Actually Operate To Exclude Damage Caused By Flood? Alberta Court Of Appeal Muddies The Water
...as a whole, there was no ambiguity and therefore no room for the Ledcor principle to operate to find coverage. In the appeal decision, 2023 ABCA 34, the majority of the Court of Appeal disagreed with the insurer's submissions and affirmed the decision below finding coverage. First, the majo......
-
2102908 Alberta Ltd v Intact Insurance Company,
...2102908 Alberta Ltd Respondent and Intact Insurance Company Appellant 2023 ABCA 34 The Court: The Honourable Justice Thomas W. Wakeling The Honourable Justice Jo'Anne Strekaf The Honourable Justice Jolaine Antonio Docket: 2203-0060AC Registry: Edmonton In the Court of Appeal of Alberta......
-
Alberta Court Of Appeal Resolves Policy Ambiguity In Favour Of Insured
...2102908 Alberta Ltd v Intact Insurance Company, 2023 ABCA 34, the Alberta Court of Appeal resolved an issue pertaining to ambiguous policy provisions in favour of the insured party. This decision highlights the importance for insurers to avoid ambiguous language in insurance policies, as su......
2 cases
-
Paramount Resources Ltd v Chubb Insurance Company of Canada,
...subjective intentions is generally inadmissible. 126 Similarly, Strekaf JA dissenting in 2102908 Alberta Ltd v Intact Insurance Company, 2023 ABCA 34 described the jurisprudence as follows: [44] “An ambiguity exists where there are ‘two reasonable but differing interpretations......
-
2102908 Alberta Ltd v Intact Insurance Company,
...2102908 Alberta Ltd Respondent and Intact Insurance Company Appellant 2023 ABCA 34 The Court: The Honourable Justice Thomas W. Wakeling The Honourable Justice Jo'Anne Strekaf The Honourable Justice Jolaine Antonio Docket: 2203-0060AC Registry: Edmonton In the Court of Appeal of Alberta......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Will A Flood Exclusion Actually Operate To Exclude Damage Caused By Flood? Alberta Court Of Appeal Muddies The Water
...as a whole, there was no ambiguity and therefore no room for the Ledcor principle to operate to find coverage. In the appeal decision, 2023 ABCA 34, the majority of the Court of Appeal disagreed with the insurer's submissions and affirmed the decision below finding coverage. First, the majo......
-
Alberta Court Of Appeal Resolves Policy Ambiguity In Favour Of Insured
...2102908 Alberta Ltd v Intact Insurance Company, 2023 ABCA 34, the Alberta Court of Appeal resolved an issue pertaining to ambiguous policy provisions in favour of the insured party. This decision highlights the importance for insurers to avoid ambiguous language in insurance policies, as su......