2212886 Ontario Inc. v. Obsidian Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 670

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePepall, van Rensburg and Trotter JJ.A.
Date27 July 2018
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Docket NumberC63617
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
26 practice notes
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (February 15 ' February 19, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 23, 2021
    ...v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, Trotter Estate, 2014 ONCA 841, Lesenko v. Guerette, 2017 ONCA 522, 2212886 Ontario Inc. v. Obsidian Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 670, Neuberger v. York, 2016 ONCA 191, Gordashevskiy v. Aharon, 2019 ONCA 297, Bank of Nova Scotia v. Zackheim (1983), 3 D.L.R. (4th) 760 (Ont. C......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 23 – July 27, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 9, 2018
    ...709, Markel Insurance Company of Canada v. ING Insurance Company of Canada, 2012 ONCA 218 2212886 Ontario Inc. v. Obsidian Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 670 Keywords: Franchise Law, Rescission, Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, S.O. 2000 ss 6(2), Civil Procedure, Summary Judgment, Ge......
  • Carmichael v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc., 2020 ONCA 447
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 8, 2020
    ...Co. (1996), 28 O.R. (3d) 423 (Gen. Div.), at p. 434, aff’d [1997] O.J. No. 3754 (Ont. C.A.); 2212886 Ontario Inc. v. Obsidian Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 670, 83 B.L.R. (5th) 186, at para. 49, leave to appeal refused, [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 391. The summary judgment judge is entitled to assume that ......
  • Core Insight Strategies Inc. v. Advanced Symbolics (2015) Inc., 2020 ONSC 2094
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 3, 2020
    ...requiring a trial (See Trotter v. Trotter, 2014 ONCA 841, at paras. 72 and 74-75; see also 2212886 Ontario Inc. v. Obsidian Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 670, at para. 34).  [28]        In doing so, the court is entitled to assume that each side has put its b......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
22 cases
  • Carmichael v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc., 2020 ONCA 447
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 8, 2020
    ...Co. (1996), 28 O.R. (3d) 423 (Gen. Div.), at p. 434, aff’d [1997] O.J. No. 3754 (Ont. C.A.); 2212886 Ontario Inc. v. Obsidian Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 670, 83 B.L.R. (5th) 186, at para. 49, leave to appeal refused, [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 391. The summary judgment judge is entitled to assume that ......
  • Core Insight Strategies Inc. v. Advanced Symbolics (2015) Inc., 2020 ONSC 2094
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 3, 2020
    ...requiring a trial (See Trotter v. Trotter, 2014 ONCA 841, at paras. 72 and 74-75; see also 2212886 Ontario Inc. v. Obsidian Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 670, at para. 34).  [28]        In doing so, the court is entitled to assume that each side has put its b......
  • Sankarsingh v. Ali, 2019 ONSC 5655
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 1, 2019
    ...para. 18 [Da Silva]. In other words, each side is expected to “put its best foot forward”: 2212886 Ontario Inc. v. Obsidian Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 670, at para. 49. The case law routinely cautions that a party responding to a motion for summary judgment must, “lead trump or risk losing”: see......
  • AlphaTaho Inc. et autre c. Maaco Canada Partnership,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • January 17, 2022
    ...À l’appui de cette position, Maaco invoque l’arrêt 2212886 Ontario Inc. c. Obsidian Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 670. Dans cette affaire, la Cour d’appel de l’Ontario a jugé que le juge saisi de la motion avait commis une erreur en rendant un ju......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (February 15 ' February 19, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 23, 2021
    ...v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, Trotter Estate, 2014 ONCA 841, Lesenko v. Guerette, 2017 ONCA 522, 2212886 Ontario Inc. v. Obsidian Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 670, Neuberger v. York, 2016 ONCA 191, Gordashevskiy v. Aharon, 2019 ONCA 297, Bank of Nova Scotia v. Zackheim (1983), 3 D.L.R. (4th) 760 (Ont. C......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 23 – July 27, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 9, 2018
    ...709, Markel Insurance Company of Canada v. ING Insurance Company of Canada, 2012 ONCA 218 2212886 Ontario Inc. v. Obsidian Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 670 Keywords: Franchise Law, Rescission, Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, S.O. 2000 ss 6(2), Civil Procedure, Summary Judgment, Ge......
  • Summary Judgment In Obsidian Contested Franchise Disclosure Case Denied
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 27, 2019
    ...has recently denied leave to appeal from the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in 2212886 Ontario Inc. v. Obsidian Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 670 (leave denied 2019 CanLII 16540 (SCC) ) affirming the Court of Appeal's decision that summary judgment may not be appropriate in cases where the......
  • Feeling ‘Crabby'?: Ontario Court Of Appeal Clarifies Scope Of Expanded Fact-Finding Powers On Summary Judgment
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 21, 2018
    ...was one of the issues before the Ontario Court of Appeal in a recent decision,2212886 Ontario Inc. et al. v. Obsidian Group Inc. et al., 2018 ONCA 670. In that case, the Court set aside a partial summary judgment, finding that it was not “in the interest of justice” to determine a key conte......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT