2483038 Ontario Inc. v. 2082100 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 475
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Kimmel J. |
| Docket Number | CV-17-00582247-0000 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Date | 30 January 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
2611707 Ontario Inc., et al v. Freshly Squeezed Franchise Juice Corporation, et al.,
...opportunity to operate the franchise but had already quit his job in anticipation. [104] In 2483038 Ontario Inc. v. 2082100 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 475, 10 B.L.R. (6th) 298, (“2483038 Ontario Inc.”) at para. 75, the court recognized that “loss” under s. 6(6)(d) requires an accounting for re......
-
AlphaTaho Inc. et autre c. Maaco Canada Partnership,
...a été expressément rejetée dans l’affaire 2483038 Ontario Inc. c. 2082100 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 475, aux par. 36 à 40. Une formulation plus récente du critère se trouve dans l’affaire 2611707 Ontario Inc. c. Freshly Sque......
-
Premium Host Inc. v. Paramount Franchise Group,
...in accordance with the Act and Regulation: see Springdale at paras. 42-44, 59, and 2483038 Ontario Inc. v. 2082100 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 475 at paras. 7, 39, 44. The Franchisees point out that none of the disclosure documents that they say they received contained a signed d. &#......
-
An Unsigned Certificate Remains A Fatal Franchise Disclosure Document Flaw In A Post-Raibex World
...once again, advised to review all outgoing FDDs to ensure that the requisite certificate is properly signed and dated. Footnotes 1 2020 ONSC 475, reasons for decision released on January 30, 2 See, for example, 6792341 Canada Inc. v. Dollar It Ltd., 2009 ONCA 385 and Mendoza v. Active Tire ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
2611707 Ontario Inc., et al v. Freshly Squeezed Franchise Juice Corporation, et al.,
...opportunity to operate the franchise but had already quit his job in anticipation. [104] In 2483038 Ontario Inc. v. 2082100 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 475, 10 B.L.R. (6th) 298, (“2483038 Ontario Inc.”) at para. 75, the court recognized that “loss” under s. 6(6)(d) requires an accounting for re......
-
AlphaTaho Inc. et autre c. Maaco Canada Partnership,
...a été expressément rejetée dans l’affaire 2483038 Ontario Inc. c. 2082100 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 475, aux par. 36 à 40. Une formulation plus récente du critère se trouve dans l’affaire 2611707 Ontario Inc. c. Freshly Sque......
-
Premium Host Inc. v. Paramount Franchise Group,
...in accordance with the Act and Regulation: see Springdale at paras. 42-44, 59, and 2483038 Ontario Inc. v. 2082100 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 475 at paras. 7, 39, 44. The Franchisees point out that none of the disclosure documents that they say they received contained a signed d. &#......
-
2483038 Ontario Inc. v. 2082100 Ontario Inc.,
...On appeal from the judgment of Justice Jessica Kimmel of the Superior Court of Justice, dated January 30, 2020, with reasons reported at 2020 ONSC 475. Tulloch [1] The parties entered into a franchise agreement to operate a “Fit f......
3 firm's commentaries
-
An Unsigned Certificate Remains A Fatal Franchise Disclosure Document Flaw In A Post-Raibex World
...once again, advised to review all outgoing FDDs to ensure that the requisite certificate is properly signed and dated. Footnotes 1 2020 ONSC 475, reasons for decision released on January 30, 2 See, for example, 6792341 Canada Inc. v. Dollar It Ltd., 2009 ONCA 385 and Mendoza v. Active Tire ......
-
Has The Law Of Franchise Rescission Changed Since Raibex? An Ontario Court Provides A Partial Answer
...the arguments of the franchisor's associate to the effect that he was only liable for amounts that he personally received. Footnotes 1 2020 ONSC 475. 2 2018 ONCA 62; see our past blog post for a summary of the Decision: 3 2483038 Ontario Inc. at para. 36. 4 2483038 Ontario Inc. at para. 38.......
-
Fit For Life Or Fit For Rescission? Ontario Superior Court Confirms That A Deficient Certificate In An FDD Is A Fatal Flaw
...failure to deliver a compliant certificate with a franchise disclosure document (FDD). In 2483038 Ontario Inc. v. 2082100 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 475, the Court held that an unsigned certificate accompanying an FDD constitutes a fatal flaw entitling a franchisee to rescind a franchise agree......