550934 British Columbia Ltd. et al. v. Thompson (A.R.) Group et al.
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | H.J. Holmes, J. |
| Citation | 2012 BCSC 1332,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1332 (SC),[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1332 |
| Date | 10 September 2012 |
| Subject Matter | EQUITY,CONTRACTS,PARTNERSHIP,PRACTICE,COMPANY LAW |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
16 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...DLR (4th) 731 (Div Ct) ............................................................ 149 550934 British Columbia Ltd v AR Thomson Group, 2012 BCSC 1332 ............ 447 671122 Ontario Ltd v Sagaz Industries Canada Inc, [2001] SCJ No 61, 2001 SCC 59, 17 BLR (3d) 1 ..................................
-
Shareholder Remedies
...the corporation pursuing a claim that it is in the corporation’s interest to pursue. 23 550934 British Columbia Ltd v AR Thomson Group , 2012 BCSC 1332. 24 Vedova v Garden House Inn Ltd (1985), 29 BLR 236 (Ont HCJ). In Roles v Reimer (1996), 146 Sask R 213 (QB), the applicant was found not ......
-
Mayer v. Mayer
...action context, Madam Justice Holmes discussed these principles very helpfully in 550934 British Columbia Ltd. v. A.R. Thomson Group , 2012 BCSC 1332. As to the requirement of good faith in s. 233(1)(c): [48] The test for good faith in this context asks whether the action has been brought p......
-
2024 BCSC 2303
...issued her reasons for judgment in the Taylor Action, referred to as 550934 British Columbia Ltd. v. A.R. Thomson Group and indexed as 2012 BCSC 1332. Justice Holmes granted leave to Taylor to continue the Taylor Action as a derivative action and to file an amended notice of civil claim in ......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
Mayer v. Mayer
...action context, Madam Justice Holmes discussed these principles very helpfully in 550934 British Columbia Ltd. v. A.R. Thomson Group , 2012 BCSC 1332. As to the requirement of good faith in s. 233(1)(c): [48] The test for good faith in this context asks whether the action has been brought p......
-
Thomson v A.R Thomson Group
...issued her reasons for judgment in the Taylor Action, referred to as 550934 British Columbia Ltd. v. A.R. Thomson Group and indexed as 2012 BCSC 1332. Justice Holmes granted leave to Taylor to continue the Taylor Action as a derivative action and to file an amended notice of civil claim in ......
-
Su v Hougen Company Ltd
...the claim: 550934 British Columbia Ltd. v. A.R. Thompson Group, 2011 BCSC 279; 550934 British Columbia Ltd. v. A.R. Thompson Group, 2012 BCSC 1332 [collectively, the Thompson 65 In the Thompson Cases, a single director of a corporation began an action in the corporation's name without the c......
-
Punni v. 0903932 B.C. Ltd.
...action does not indicate that the petitioner brings the action in bad faith: 550934 British Columbia Ltd., v. A.R. Thomson Group, 2012 BCSC 1332 at para. 50. This is especially so when the petitioner has shown that the directors have failed to respond adequately or at all to alleged fi......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...DLR (4th) 731 (Div Ct) ............................................................ 149 550934 British Columbia Ltd v AR Thomson Group, 2012 BCSC 1332 ............ 447 671122 Ontario Ltd v Sagaz Industries Canada Inc, [2001] SCJ No 61, 2001 SCC 59, 17 BLR (3d) 1 ..................................
-
Shareholder Remedies
...the corporation pursuing a claim that it is in the corporation’s interest to pursue. 23 550934 British Columbia Ltd v AR Thomson Group , 2012 BCSC 1332. 24 Vedova v Garden House Inn Ltd (1985), 29 BLR 236 (Ont HCJ). In Roles v Reimer (1996), 146 Sask R 213 (QB), the applicant was found not ......