K & L Land Partnership et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1701 (SC)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Fisher, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | TORTS,PRACTICE,LIMITATION OF ACTIONS |
| Citation | [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1701 (SC),2014 BCSC 1701,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1701 |
| Date | 09 September 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Ward v. Cariboo Regional District,
...is an actionable wrong in and of itself, if the object remains on the land: K & L Land Partnership v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 BCSC 1701 [K & L] at If a structure or other object is placed on another’s land, not only the initial intrusion but also failure to remove it ......
-
Englehart v. Holt et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1969 (SC)
...property, the claims of nuisance and trespass may overlap to some extent: see K & L Land Partnership v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 BCSC 1701 at para. 47 and see generally Moyer v. Mortensen , 2010 BCSC 1528. For the same reasons that apply in my discussion of nuisance, I find that ......
2 cases
-
Ward v. Cariboo Regional District,
...is an actionable wrong in and of itself, if the object remains on the land: K & L Land Partnership v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 BCSC 1701 [K & L] at If a structure or other object is placed on another’s land, not only the initial intrusion but also failure to remove it ......
-
Englehart v. Holt et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1969 (SC)
...property, the claims of nuisance and trespass may overlap to some extent: see K & L Land Partnership v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 BCSC 1701 at para. 47 and see generally Moyer v. Mortensen , 2010 BCSC 1528. For the same reasons that apply in my discussion of nuisance, I find that ......