A.E v. A.E., 2021 ONSC 8189
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Deborah L. Chappel |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ONSC 8189 |
| Docket Number | FC 204/16 |
| Citation | 2021 ONSC 8189 |
| Date | 13 December 2021 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
14 practice notes
-
Special or Extraordinary Expenses
...2023 NBKB 202. 11 Joe-Joe v Joe-Joe, 2023 ABKB 551 at para 21, Lema J; see also Meier v Sirman, 2023 ABKB 704 at para 71, citing AE v AE, 2021 ONSC 8189. 12 Whitley v Whitley, [1997] BCJ No 3116 (SC); Davis v Davis, [1999] BCJ No 1832 (SC); but see contra Hannigan v Hannigan, [1998] BCJ No ......
-
Table of Cases
...Adubofuor v Ontario (Director, Family Responsibility Office), [2001] OJ No 708 (CA).........................527 AE v AE, 2021 ONSC 8189...................................................................................................................... 279, 285 AEC v GBH, [1998] NSJ No 580......
-
Enyedy-Goldner v Goldner,
...any consequences of the misconduct, which may be relevant as impacting the other spouse's ability to become self-sufficient. A.E v. A.E., 2021 ONSC 8189 (SCJ). The emotional consequences of spousal misconduct, such as depression, may be considered. Leskun v. Leskun, 2006 SCC 25 (SCC); Meffe......
-
Savoie v Lambert,
...DBS v SRG, 2006 SCC 37 at paras 2 and 69-70; Kerr at para 206; Harbaugh CA at para 31; MAB v MGC, 2022 ONSC 7207 at para 449; AE v AE, 2021 ONSC 8189 at para 154 In recent years, the framework for assessing retroactive child support claims, originally set down in DBS, and including the “ DB......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
Enyedy-Goldner v Goldner,
...any consequences of the misconduct, which may be relevant as impacting the other spouse's ability to become self-sufficient. A.E v. A.E., 2021 ONSC 8189 (SCJ). The emotional consequences of spousal misconduct, such as depression, may be considered. Leskun v. Leskun, 2006 SCC 25 (SCC); Meffe......
-
Savoie v Lambert,
...DBS v SRG, 2006 SCC 37 at paras 2 and 69-70; Kerr at para 206; Harbaugh CA at para 31; MAB v MGC, 2022 ONSC 7207 at para 449; AE v AE, 2021 ONSC 8189 at para 154 In recent years, the framework for assessing retroactive child support claims, originally set down in DBS, and including the “ DB......
-
Khan v Khan,
...of income available from them for the support of their dependants or themselves ( Duffy v. Duffy, 2009 NLCA 48 (NLCA); A.E. v. A.E., 2021 ONSC 8189 (S.C.J.), at para. 256). The list of circumstances set out in section 19 of the Guidelines in which the court may impute income is not exhausti......
-
Gaynor v Cruz Belliard,
...the credibility determinations below, I have considered and applied the factors sent out by my colleague, Chappel J., in A.E. v. A.E., 2021 ONSC 8189, at paras. 6-7, including, but not limited to: a consideration of consistency and inconsistency of evidence, including documentary evidence; ......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Special or Extraordinary Expenses
...2023 NBKB 202. 11 Joe-Joe v Joe-Joe, 2023 ABKB 551 at para 21, Lema J; see also Meier v Sirman, 2023 ABKB 704 at para 71, citing AE v AE, 2021 ONSC 8189. 12 Whitley v Whitley, [1997] BCJ No 3116 (SC); Davis v Davis, [1999] BCJ No 1832 (SC); but see contra Hannigan v Hannigan, [1998] BCJ No ......
-
Table of Cases
...Adubofuor v Ontario (Director, Family Responsibility Office), [2001] OJ No 708 (CA).........................527 AE v AE, 2021 ONSC 8189...................................................................................................................... 279, 285 AEC v GBH, [1998] NSJ No 580......