A.A. v. C.A., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1419 (SC)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Abrioux, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | FAMILY LAW,PRACTICE |
| Date | 27 September 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...v M(RM) (1997), 30 RFL (4th) 269, [1997] OJ No 6365 (Gen Div)............................................................105 AA v CA, 2012 BCSC 1419............................................................................................................................................216......
-
Table of cases
...NBJ No 340, 289 NBR (2d) 109 (QB) ..........................................................................................465 AA v CA, 2012 BCSC 1419 ..........................................................................................................................................2......
-
Determination of income; disclosure of income
...(4th) 254 (Man CA); see also CGL v DKL, 2016 ABQB 71; Luedke v Luedke, [2004] BCJ No 1157 (CA); Karisik v Chow, 2010 BCCA 548; AA v CA, 2012 BCSC 1419; LMK v JMK, 2015 MBQB 1; Wyndels v Minuk, 2019 MBQB 96; JR v CR, [2005] NSJ No 502 (SC); Szitas v Szitas, 2012 ONSC 1548; Koren v Blum, [200......
-
Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
...(4th) 254 (Man CA); see also CGL v DKL, 2016 ABQB 71; Luedke v Luedke, [2004] BCJ No 1157 (CA); Karisik v Chow, 2010 BCCA 548; AA v CA, 2012 BCSC 1419; LMK v JMK, 2015 MBQB 1; Wyndels v Minuk, 2019 MBQB JR v CR, [2005] NSJ No 502 (SC); Szitas v Szitas, 2012 ONSC 1548; Koren v Blum, [2000] P......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
J.R. v. N.R., 2017 BCSC 455
...Baker who stated: [81] On the issue of capital cost allowance, counsel for Mr. Eastwood has relied on the decision in A.A. v. C.A., 2012 BCSC 1419. In that case, Justice Abrioux concluded that the husband's deduction for capital cost allowance should not be allowed to "…artificially reduce ......
-
D.J.F. v. V.J.F., 2013 BCSC 2019
...working with them once the school year commences in September. C: The Applicable Principles [120] As I summarized in A.A. v. C.A. , 2012 BCSC 1419 at paras. 40-42, the principles which apply when the claimant was earning an income either through his companies or the proprietorship (that is ......
-
Jadavji v. Khadjieva,
...the principle that it may be allowed in certain circumstances. However, that will be the exception rather than the rule: A.A. v. C.A., 2012 BCSC 1419 at paras 43, 47 – 49, citing Luedke v. Luedke, 2004 BCCA [90] In this case, the capital cost......
-
Schilter v. Schilter, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2149
...fencing panels. In 2012, there is added, before depreciation, a 2012 Polaris ATV. In 2013, there are no additions. [53] In A.A. v. C.A. , 2012 BCSC 1419, Mr. Justice Abrioux, after reviewing a number of cases dealing with capital cost allowance, concluded the test is reasonableness. In deal......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...v M(RM) (1997), 30 RFL (4th) 269, [1997] OJ No 6365 (Gen Div)............................................................105 AA v CA, 2012 BCSC 1419............................................................................................................................................216......
-
Table of cases
...NBJ No 340, 289 NBR (2d) 109 (QB) ..........................................................................................465 AA v CA, 2012 BCSC 1419 ..........................................................................................................................................2......
-
Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
...(4th) 254 (Man CA); see also CGL v DKL, 2016 ABQB 71; Luedke v Luedke, [2004] BCJ No 1157 (CA); Karisik v Chow, 2010 BCCA 548; AA v CA, 2012 BCSC 1419; LMK v JMK, 2015 MBQB 1; Wyndels v Minuk, 2019 MBQB JR v CR, [2005] NSJ No 502 (SC); Szitas v Szitas, 2012 ONSC 1548; Koren v Blum, [2000] P......
-
Determination of income; disclosure of income
...(4th) 254 (Man CA); see also CGL v DKL, 2016 ABQB 71; Luedke v Luedke, [2004] BCJ No 1157 (CA); Karisik v Chow, 2010 BCCA 548; AA v CA, 2012 BCSC 1419; LMK v JMK, 2015 MBQB 1; Wyndels v Minuk, 2019 MBQB 96; JR v CR, [2005] NSJ No 502 (SC); Szitas v Szitas, 2012 ONSC 1548; Koren v Blum, [200......