Abbott and Haliburton Co. Ltd. et al. v. WBLI Chartered Accountants, [2015] N.R. TBEd. AP.021
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, C.J.C., Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver, Wagner and Gascon, JJ. |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,EVIDENCE,CRIMINAL LAW |
| Citation | [2015] N.R. TBEd. AP.021,2015 SCC 23,383 DLR (4th) 429,[2015] SCJ No 23 (QL),[2015] CarswellNS 313,[2015] ACS no 23,[2015] 2 SCR 182,470 NR 324 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Date | 30 April 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Abbott and Haliburton Co. Ltd. et al. v. WBLI Chartered Accountants, [2015] N.R. TBEd. AP.021
...language version follows English language version] [La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise] Temp. Cite: [2015] N.R. TBEd. AP.021 White Burgess Langille Inman, carrying on business as WBLI Chartered Accountants and R. Brian Burgess (appellants) v. Abbott and Haliburton ......
-
British Columbia Society of Eye Physicians and Surgeons v. British Columbia (Medical Services Commission), 2018 BCSC 1923
...independent nor impartial and his opinion evidence is therefore inadmissible: White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co., [2015] SCC 23 at para. [75] While I acknowledge that it is reasonably foreseeable that the reduction of the Cata......
-
Brown v. Kagan (Brown), 2019 ONSC 5033
...qualified to give expert opinion evidence and is not independent or impartial (White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co., [2015] SCC 23, at para. 45). [48] Having reviewed the cross-examination of Dr. Weiser, I am satisfied that she is qualified to provide opinion evidence a......
-
R. v. Clarke (B.E.) et al., 2016 NSSC 219
...They argue Mr. Evans is not a "properly qualified expert" as defined in R. v. Mohan , [1994] 2 S.C.R. 9, and White Burgess v. Abbott (2015), S.C.C. 23. [4] Expert opinion evidence is presumptively inadmissible. The party seeking to adduce opinion evidence bears the burden of establishing it......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Abbott and Haliburton Co. Ltd. et al. v. WBLI Chartered Accountants, [2015] N.R. TBEd. AP.021
...language version follows English language version] [La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise] Temp. Cite: [2015] N.R. TBEd. AP.021 White Burgess Langille Inman, carrying on business as WBLI Chartered Accountants and R. Brian Burgess (appellants) v. Abbott and Haliburton ......
-
British Columbia Society of Eye Physicians and Surgeons v. British Columbia (Medical Services Commission), 2018 BCSC 1923
...independent nor impartial and his opinion evidence is therefore inadmissible: White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co., [2015] SCC 23 at para. [75] While I acknowledge that it is reasonably foreseeable that the reduction of the Cata......
-
Brown v. Kagan (Brown), 2019 ONSC 5033
...qualified to give expert opinion evidence and is not independent or impartial (White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co., [2015] SCC 23, at para. 45). [48] Having reviewed the cross-examination of Dr. Weiser, I am satisfied that she is qualified to provide opinion evidence a......
-
R. v. Clarke (B.E.) et al., 2016 NSSC 219
...They argue Mr. Evans is not a "properly qualified expert" as defined in R. v. Mohan , [1994] 2 S.C.R. 9, and White Burgess v. Abbott (2015), S.C.C. 23. [4] Expert opinion evidence is presumptively inadmissible. The party seeking to adduce opinion evidence bears the burden of establishing it......
Request a trial to view additional results