Aboud v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 415 (FC)

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
JudgeRoy, J.
Citation[2014] F.T.R. Uned. 415 (FC),[2014] F.T.R. Uned. 415,2014 FC 1019
Date27 October 2014
Subject MatterIMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 practice notes
  • Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 20, 2022
    ...Don v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 829 at para 1 and Aboud v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 1019 at para 35. Oral hearing was required [36] The Applicant asserts that he has a well-founded fear of persecution grounded in Sri Lankan authorities&#x2......
  • Mohamed v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 2, 2016
    ...to be accorded to the evidence, warrants considerable deference ( Belaroui at para 10; Aboud v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 1019 at para 33 [ Aboud ]; Korkmaz v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) , 2015 FC 1124 at para 9 [ Korkmaz ]). [13] The Applicant also......
  • Chirivi et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. TBEd. OC.008
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 16, 2015
    ...record is within the expertise of the PRRA officer, thus deference is owed ( Aboud v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 1019 at para 33; Ferguson v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2008 FC 1067, [2008] FCJ 1308 at para 33). VIII. Analysis [35] It is......
  • Kulanayagam v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 26, 2015
    ...Raza v MCI , 2007 FCA 385 at para 12; Singh v MCI , 2014 FC 11 at paras 22-24; Aboud v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 1019 at para 20). Rather, the purpose of a PRRA is to assess new risk developments between the RPD hearing date and the removal date, in order to......
  • Get Started for Free
10 cases
  • Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 20, 2022
    ...Don v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 829 at para 1 and Aboud v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 1019 at para 35. Oral hearing was required [36] The Applicant asserts that he has a well-founded fear of persecution grounded in Sri Lankan authorities&#x2......
  • Mohamed v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 2, 2016
    ...to be accorded to the evidence, warrants considerable deference ( Belaroui at para 10; Aboud v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 1019 at para 33 [ Aboud ]; Korkmaz v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) , 2015 FC 1124 at para 9 [ Korkmaz ]). [13] The Applicant also......
  • Chirivi et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. TBEd. OC.008
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 16, 2015
    ...record is within the expertise of the PRRA officer, thus deference is owed ( Aboud v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 1019 at para 33; Ferguson v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2008 FC 1067, [2008] FCJ 1308 at para 33). VIII. Analysis [35] It is......
  • Kulanayagam v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 26, 2015
    ...Raza v MCI , 2007 FCA 385 at para 12; Singh v MCI , 2014 FC 11 at paras 22-24; Aboud v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 1019 at para 20). Rather, the purpose of a PRRA is to assess new risk developments between the RPD hearing date and the removal date, in order to......
  • Get Started for Free