AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 309
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Dawn Pentelechuk |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 309 |
| Date | 04 September 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 2003-0087-AC |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
AC and JF v Alberta,
...it interpreted that test and applied it to a particular set of facts. [92] Three interventions were permitted by A.C. and J.F. v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 309: (a) The British Columbia Civil Liberties Association was given permission to intervene on whether the respondent’s claim is arguable as a ......
-
Métis Nation of Alberta Association v Alberta (Indigenous Relations),
...2006 ABCA 43 at para. 5, 380 AR 306. Interventions that rely on fresh evidence are presumptively impermissible: A.C. and J.F. v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 309 at para 11. Additional evidence cannot be referred to on appeal unless an application for fresh evidence is made in accordance with R. 14.45......
-
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc v Perpetual Energy Inc,
...2000 ABCA 217 at para 10, citing Ahyasou v Alberta (Minister of Environmental Protection), 1998 ABQB 875 at para 4; AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 309 at para 9. D. The Proposed Interveners [15] The Orphan Well Association is a primarily industry-funded association, reflecting a collaborati......
-
R v McKee,
...evolving. 22 It is not appropriate for an intervenor to extend legal argument beyond what the parties have advanced: AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 309 at para 11, citing Deloitte & Touche LLP v Ontario (Securities Commission), 2003 SCC 61 at para 31. In particular, an intervenor should......
4 cases
-
AC and JF v Alberta,
...it interpreted that test and applied it to a particular set of facts. [92] Three interventions were permitted by A.C. and J.F. v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 309: (a) The British Columbia Civil Liberties Association was given permission to intervene on whether the respondent’s claim is arguable as a ......
-
Métis Nation of Alberta Association v Alberta (Indigenous Relations),
...2006 ABCA 43 at para. 5, 380 AR 306. Interventions that rely on fresh evidence are presumptively impermissible: A.C. and J.F. v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 309 at para 11. Additional evidence cannot be referred to on appeal unless an application for fresh evidence is made in accordance with R. 14.45......
-
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc v Perpetual Energy Inc,
...2000 ABCA 217 at para 10, citing Ahyasou v Alberta (Minister of Environmental Protection), 1998 ABQB 875 at para 4; AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 309 at para 9. D. The Proposed Interveners [15] The Orphan Well Association is a primarily industry-funded association, reflecting a collaborati......
-
R v McKee,
...evolving. 22 It is not appropriate for an intervenor to extend legal argument beyond what the parties have advanced: AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 309 at para 11, citing Deloitte & Touche LLP v Ontario (Securities Commission), 2003 SCC 61 at para 31. In particular, an intervenor should......