Acevedo v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2006] F.T.R. Uned. 890
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Judge | Shore, J. |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,CIVIL RIGHTS |
Citation | [2006] F.T.R. Uned. 890,2006 FC 480,[2006] F.T.R. Uned. 890 (FC) |
Date | 12 April 2006 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Cheema v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 546
...7; Horvath v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 670, at para 25; Acevedo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2006 FC 480, at paras 76-77). [30] Mr. Cheema's judicial review application is dismissed. [31] Neither party has proposed a question of general importanc......
-
Aguilar Moncada v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2012] F.T.R. Uned. 57 (FC)
...allow the IRB to find that there was no subjective fear of persecution (see Acevedo v Canada ( Minister of Citizenship and Immigration ), 2006 FC 480, at para 75. As to his fear of the Zetas, the IRB panel pointed out: "the claimant stated that ... they had never done anything to him, but h......
2 cases
-
Cheema v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 546
...7; Horvath v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 670, at para 25; Acevedo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2006 FC 480, at paras 76-77). [30] Mr. Cheema's judicial review application is dismissed. [31] Neither party has proposed a question of general importanc......
-
Aguilar Moncada v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2012] F.T.R. Uned. 57 (FC)
...allow the IRB to find that there was no subjective fear of persecution (see Acevedo v Canada ( Minister of Citizenship and Immigration ), 2006 FC 480, at para 75. As to his fear of the Zetas, the IRB panel pointed out: "the claimant stated that ... they had never done anything to him, but h......