Adams v. Adams, (1997) 124 Man.R.(2d) 226 (QBFD)
Judge | Diamond, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada) |
Case Date | December 15, 1997 |
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Citations | (1997), 124 Man.R.(2d) 226 (QBFD) |
Adams v. Adams (1997), 124 Man.R.(2d) 226 (QBFD)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [1998] Man.R.(2d) TBEd. JA.013
Carol Ann Adams (petitioner) v. Gary Lynn Adams (respondent)
(File No. FD 94-01-38007)
Indexed As: Adams v. Adams
Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench
Family Division
Winnipeg Centre
Diamond, J.
December 15, 1997.
Summary:
A divorce judgment required a father to pay child support of $600 per month for the two children of the marriage. The children were both over the age of majority and were attending university. The mother sought to vary the judgment on the basis that the father should now be required to pay child support in an amount determined by applying the Federal Child Support Guidelines. The children both continued to attend university. At issue was whether an amount determined by applying the Guidelines was appropriate (Guidelines, s. 3(2)).
The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Family Division, held that it was not appropriate to order an amount of child support that was determined by applying the Guidelines. The court considered the condition, needs, means and other circumstances of the children and the financial ability of the parents to contribute to their support and ordered the father to pay a total of $335 per month.
Family Law - Topic 4017
Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance and awards - Awards - Variation of periodic payments or lump sum award - [See Family Law - Topic 4045.11 ].
Family Law - Topic 4045.11
Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance - Support Guidelines - Children over the age of majority - A divorce judgment required a father to pay child support of $600 per month for two children who were both over the age of majority and were attending university - The mother sought to vary the judgment on the basis that the father should now be required to pay child support in an amount determined by applying the Federal Child Support Guidelines - Both children were still attending university - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Family Division, held that considering the amount of money that was available to each child through employment, scholarships and student loans, it was not appropriate to order an amount of child support that was determined by applying the Guidelines (Guidelines, s. 3(2)) - The court considered the condition, needs, means and other circumstances of the children and the financial ability of the parents and ordered the father to pay a total of $335 per month.
Statutes Noticed:
Divorce Act Regulations (Can.), Federal Child Support Guidelines, SOR/97-175, sect. 3(2) [para. 9].
Federal Child Support Guidelines - see Divorce Act Regulations (Can.).
Counsel:
Howard Tennenhouse, for the petitioner;
Douglas E. Johnston, for the respondent.
This motion was heard before Diamond, J., of the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Family Division, Winnipeg Centre, who delivered the following judgment on December 15, 1997.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Table of cases
...(B.C.S.C.) ...................................................................................485 Adams v. Adams, [1997] M.J. No. 621, 124 Man. R. (2d) 226 (Q.B.) ......................................................... 109 Adams v. Adams, [1998] N.B.J. No. 15, [1998] N.B.R. (2d) (Supp.) N......
-
Table of cases
...3 R.F.L. (3d) 157 (B.C.S.C.) ................................................................ 525 Adams v. Adams, [1997] M.J. No. 621, 124 Man. R. (2d) 226 (Q.B.) ........................................ 74 Adams v. Adams, [1998] N.B.J. No. 15, [1998] N.B.R. (2d) (Supp.) No. 7 (Q.B.) ............
-
Chapple v. Campbell, 2005 MBQB 199
...Div.), refd to. [Schedule A]. Fong v. Charbonneau (2005), 194 Man.R.(2d) 45 (Q.B. Fam. Div.), refd to. [Schedule A]. Adams v. Adams (1997), 124 Man.R.(2d) 226 (Q.B. Fam. Div.), refd to. [Schedule Statutes Noticed: Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985 (2nd Supp.), c. 3, sect. 2(1) [para. 5]. Divorce Act......
-
Mathieu v. Mathieu, (1998) 127 Man.R.(2d) 150 (QBFD)
...as if he were under the age of majority. He submits that the approach taken by Diamond, J., in Adams v. Adams (1997), M.J. No. 621; 124 Man.R.(2d) 226, should be followed and support should be determined by applying s. 3(2)(b) of the Guidelines . In Adams , both of the children were attendi......
-
Chapple v. Campbell, 2005 MBQB 199
...Div.), refd to. [Schedule A]. Fong v. Charbonneau (2005), 194 Man.R.(2d) 45 (Q.B. Fam. Div.), refd to. [Schedule A]. Adams v. Adams (1997), 124 Man.R.(2d) 226 (Q.B. Fam. Div.), refd to. [Schedule Statutes Noticed: Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985 (2nd Supp.), c. 3, sect. 2(1) [para. 5]. Divorce Act......
-
Mathieu v. Mathieu, (1998) 127 Man.R.(2d) 150 (QBFD)
...as if he were under the age of majority. He submits that the approach taken by Diamond, J., in Adams v. Adams (1997), M.J. No. 621; 124 Man.R.(2d) 226, should be followed and support should be determined by applying s. 3(2)(b) of the Guidelines . In Adams , both of the children were attendi......
-
C.E.R.B. v. B.Y.E.M.L., (2004) 182 Man.R.(2d) 148 (QB)
...refd to. [para. 12]. Olson v. Olson (2003), 320 A.R. 379; 288 W.A.C. 379; 36 R.F.L.(5th) 196, refd to. [para. 13]. Adams v. Adams (1997), 124 Man.R.(2d) 226 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Authors and Works Noticed: Manitoba, Law Reform Commission, The Testators Family Maintenance Act, Report No. 6......
-
Oswald v. Oswald,
...520 A.P.R. 70 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 19]. Finn v. Levine (1997), 31 O.T.C. 192 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 19]. Adams v. Adams (1997), 124 Man.R.(2d) 226 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985 (2nd Supp.), c. 3, sect. 2(1)(b) [para. 9]. Divorce Act Regulations ......
-
Table of cases
...(B.C.S.C.) ...................................................................................485 Adams v. Adams, [1997] M.J. No. 621, 124 Man. R. (2d) 226 (Q.B.) ......................................................... 109 Adams v. Adams, [1998] N.B.J. No. 15, [1998] N.B.R. (2d) (Supp.) N......
-
Table of cases
...3 R.F.L. (3d) 157 (B.C.S.C.) ................................................................ 525 Adams v. Adams, [1997] M.J. No. 621, 124 Man. R. (2d) 226 (Q.B.) ........................................ 74 Adams v. Adams, [1998] N.B.J. No. 15, [1998] N.B.R. (2d) (Supp.) No. 7 (Q.B.) ............