AFX Licensing Corp. v. HJC America Inc. et al., 2016 FC 435
| Judge | Diner, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | April 22, 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2016 FC 435 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Crocs Canada, Inc. v. Double Diamond Distribution Ltd, 2022 FC 1443
...to the rebuttable presumption of originality applicable in this matter: ID Act, s 7(3); AFX Licensing Corporation v HJC America, Inc, 2016 FC 435 [AFX] at para 101. [80] According to the Supreme Court, “to constitute an original design there must be some substantial difference betwee......
-
“Wow Moments” and Industrial Design Infringement
...it cannot have been published more than a year before application for registration. In AFX Licensing Corporation v. HJC America, Inc., 2016 FC 435 (CanLII), the court decided that AFX’s industrial design registration was valid but was not infringed by the HJC product because the court saw “......
-
'Wow Moments' and Industrial Design Infringement
...it cannot have been published more than a year before application for registration. In AFX Licensing Corporation v. HJC America, Inc., 2016 FC 435 (CanLII), the court decided that AFX's industrial design registration was valid but was not infringed by the HJC product because the court saw "......
-
An Industrial Design Registration For A Helmet Face Shield Is Found To Be Valid, But Not Infringed (Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts - Week of May 9, 2016)
...design registration for a helmet face shield is found to be valid, but not infringed AFX Licensing Corporation v. HJC America, Inc., 2016 FC 435 The Federal Court has found that while the Plaintiff AFX's industrial design is valid, the Defendants have not infringed AFX's industrial design i......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
-
Crocs Canada, Inc. v. Double Diamond Distribution Ltd, 2022 FC 1443
...to the rebuttable presumption of originality applicable in this matter: ID Act, s 7(3); AFX Licensing Corporation v HJC America, Inc, 2016 FC 435 [AFX] at para 101. [80] According to the Supreme Court, “to constitute an original design there must be some substantial difference betwee......
-
Mishan & Sons v. Supertek Can. Inc., [2016] F.T.R. Uned. 223 (FC)
...Diner of this Court referred to the requirements of originality in his recent decision in AFX Licencing Corporation v HJC America, Inc. , 2016 FC 435 at paragraphs 106 to 111 : [106] Unlike the grounds in subsection 6(1) and paragraph 6(3)(a), which the Act clearly describes, originality is......
3 firm's commentaries
-
“Wow Moments” and Industrial Design Infringement
...it cannot have been published more than a year before application for registration. In AFX Licensing Corporation v. HJC America, Inc., 2016 FC 435 (CanLII), the court decided that AFX’s industrial design registration was valid but was not infringed by the HJC product because the court saw “......
-
'Wow Moments' and Industrial Design Infringement
...it cannot have been published more than a year before application for registration. In AFX Licensing Corporation v. HJC America, Inc., 2016 FC 435 (CanLII), the court decided that AFX's industrial design registration was valid but was not infringed by the HJC product because the court saw "......
-
An Industrial Design Registration For A Helmet Face Shield Is Found To Be Valid, But Not Infringed (Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts - Week of May 9, 2016)
...design registration for a helmet face shield is found to be valid, but not infringed AFX Licensing Corporation v. HJC America, Inc., 2016 FC 435 The Federal Court has found that while the Plaintiff AFX's industrial design is valid, the Defendants have not infringed AFX's industrial design i......