Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

Aguilar et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 150

Judgment Cited authorities 18 Cited in 6 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeScott, J.
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Subject MatterLABOUR LAW,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Citation2012 FC 150,[2012] F.T.R. Uned. 72,[2012] F.T.R. Uned. 72 (FC)
Date03 February 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Odia v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 287 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 8, 2014
    ...whereas reasonableness applies to the RPD member's credibility assessment ( Aguilar v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2012 FC 150 at para 14; Mejia v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2009 FC 354 at para 26; Zarza v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Imm......
  • Metskhvarishvili v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1350
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 28, 2022
    ...provided themselves (Gu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 543 at para 29; Aguilar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 150 at para 31; Mohamed Mahdoon v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 284 at para 22; Lawal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 ......
  • Moïse v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 93
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 22, 2019
    ...provided themselves (Gu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 543 at para 29; Aguilar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 150 at para 31; Mohamed Mahdoon v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 284 at para 22; Lawal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 ......
  • Mbuyamba v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 918
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 22, 2020
    ...was reasonable for the RPD to conclude that the applicant’s story was not credible (Aguilar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 150 at paras 35–42). [38]  In this case, I do not accept the argument that despite its credibility findings, the RPD must take count......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Odia v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 287 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 8, 2014
    ...whereas reasonableness applies to the RPD member's credibility assessment ( Aguilar v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2012 FC 150 at para 14; Mejia v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2009 FC 354 at para 26; Zarza v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Imm......
  • Metskhvarishvili v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1350
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 28, 2022
    ...provided themselves (Gu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 543 at para 29; Aguilar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 150 at para 31; Mohamed Mahdoon v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 284 at para 22; Lawal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 ......
  • Moïse v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 93
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 22, 2019
    ...provided themselves (Gu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 543 at para 29; Aguilar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 150 at para 31; Mohamed Mahdoon v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 284 at para 22; Lawal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 ......
  • Mbuyamba v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 918
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 22, 2020
    ...was reasonable for the RPD to conclude that the applicant’s story was not credible (Aguilar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 150 at paras 35–42). [38]  In this case, I do not accept the argument that despite its credibility findings, the RPD must take count......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT