Ait Elhocine v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1068

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date19 November 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Rodriguez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 774
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 27, 2022
    ...destabilized the Applicants and hindered the presentation of their arguments (see: Ait Elhocine v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1068 at para 24). [47] In my view, the RAD reasonably found that, in these circumstances, it was not obvious that the former representative’......
  • Danaj v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2024 FC 402
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 8, 2024
    ...Local 301 v Montreal (City), 1997 CanLII 386 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 793, at para 81 and Ait Elhocine v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1068, at paras 28 to [32] In the case at bar, the ID discussed the defense of necessity at length at pages 5 and 6 of its reasons, largely based ......
  • Kalu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 506
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 11, 2023
    ...9 [Aiyathurai]; Gabor v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 150 at para 40; Ait Elhocine v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1068 at para 15 [Ait Elhocine]. As the Court explains in Austria v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 423 [Austria] at pa......
  • Imafidon v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1592
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 29, 2023
    ...and explain how this is determinative in resolving an issue central to the claim (see Ait Elhocine v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1068 [Ait Elhocine] at para [32] I understand the Applicant to argue that the Court should prefer the guidance of the Supreme Court of Canada in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Rodriguez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 774
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 27, 2022
    ...destabilized the Applicants and hindered the presentation of their arguments (see: Ait Elhocine v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1068 at para 24). [47] In my view, the RAD reasonably found that, in these circumstances, it was not obvious that the former representative’......
  • Kalu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 506
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 11, 2023
    ...9 [Aiyathurai]; Gabor v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 150 at para 40; Ait Elhocine v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1068 at para 15 [Ait Elhocine]. As the Court explains in Austria v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 423 [Austria] at pa......
  • Imafidon v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1592
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 29, 2023
    ...and explain how this is determinative in resolving an issue central to the claim (see Ait Elhocine v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1068 [Ait Elhocine] at para [32] I understand the Applicant to argue that the Court should prefer the guidance of the Supreme Court of Canada in......
  • Bonilla v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 493
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 6, 2022
    ...Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Law Proceedings (November 5, 2018); Ait Elhocine v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1068 at para 38. I do not reject the proposed question on this basis, because it arose from the nuances of the respondent’s position that ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT