Akram v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 143
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 143 |
| Date | 27 January 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Hernandez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1060
...evidence that may have impacted the outcome of a decision constitutes a reviewable error (Akram v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 143; Tamayo Valencia v Canada , 2018 FC 1013). The RPD’s possible misinterpretation of the father’s statement clearly tainted its assessment of bot......
-
Oluwo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 760
...[33] The Applicants have not demonstrated that these exceptions apply to the case at bar (Akram v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 143 at paras 15–16; Homaire v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1197 at para 23; Ratnasingam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 20......
2 cases
-
Hernandez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1060
...evidence that may have impacted the outcome of a decision constitutes a reviewable error (Akram v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 143; Tamayo Valencia v Canada , 2018 FC 1013). The RPD’s possible misinterpretation of the father’s statement clearly tainted its assessment of bot......
-
Oluwo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 760
...[33] The Applicants have not demonstrated that these exceptions apply to the case at bar (Akram v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 143 at paras 15–16; Homaire v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1197 at para 23; Ratnasingam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 20......