Alkurd v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 298

CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Case DateMarch 12, 2019
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2019 FC 298
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Chukwunyere v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 210
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 8, 2021
    ...19; Ikeme v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 21 at paras 40-42; and Alkurd v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 298 at para 27. I see no reason to depart from this line of cases in the circumstances of the matter before me. IV. [19] For all the foregoing re......
  • Fabunmi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1009
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 26, 2020
    ...19; Ikeme v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 21 at paras 40-42; and Alkurd v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 298 at para 27. I see no reason to depart from this line of cases in the present circumstances. IV. [23] I therefore find that the Applicant has ......
  • Imam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1194
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 30, 2020
    ...have a genuine fear of harm, which will depend on their particular circumstances (see also Alkurd v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 298 at para 23). It did not require individualized set of facts; the RAD’s use of individual or subjective fear of harm is not contrary to......
  • Gharbi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 20, 2021
    ...of former habitual residence is a finding of fact that is owed a high degree of deference (Alkurd v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 298 at para 32). The Respondent also relies on Chehade v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 282 to argue that even if the Applicants c......
4 cases
  • Chukwunyere v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 210
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 8, 2021
    ...19; Ikeme v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 21 at paras 40-42; and Alkurd v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 298 at para 27. I see no reason to depart from this line of cases in the circumstances of the matter before me. IV. [19] For all the foregoing re......
  • Fabunmi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1009
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 26, 2020
    ...19; Ikeme v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 21 at paras 40-42; and Alkurd v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 298 at para 27. I see no reason to depart from this line of cases in the present circumstances. IV. [23] I therefore find that the Applicant has ......
  • Imam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1194
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 30, 2020
    ...have a genuine fear of harm, which will depend on their particular circumstances (see also Alkurd v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 298 at para 23). It did not require individualized set of facts; the RAD’s use of individual or subjective fear of harm is not contrary to......
  • Gharbi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 20, 2021
    ...of former habitual residence is a finding of fact that is owed a high degree of deference (Alkurd v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 298 at para 32). The Respondent also relies on Chehade v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 282 to argue that even if the Applicants c......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT