AM Gold Inc. v. Kaizen Discovery Inc.,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeDickson,Goepel,Grauer
Citation2022 BCCA 284
Docket NumberCA47774; CA47791
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Date22 August 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • 2023 BCSC 930,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...the Court of Appeal, and another, by Justice Voith, when he was still a member of this Court. In AM Gold Inc. v. Kaizen Discovery Inc., 2022 BCCA 284, Justice Goepel wrote as follows at paras. 59–60: [59] Dishonest testimony alone is not sufficient to warrant an order for special cos......
  • United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union Local 2009 v Ghag,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 1, 2023
    ...the Court of Appeal, and another, by Justice Voith, when he was still a member of this Court. In AM Gold Inc. v. Kaizen Discovery Inc., 2022 BCCA 284, Justice Goepel wrote as follows at paras. 59–60: [59] Dishonest testimony alone is not sufficient to warrant an order for special cos......
2 cases
  • 2023 BCSC 930,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...the Court of Appeal, and another, by Justice Voith, when he was still a member of this Court. In AM Gold Inc. v. Kaizen Discovery Inc., 2022 BCCA 284, Justice Goepel wrote as follows at paras. 59–60: [59] Dishonest testimony alone is not sufficient to warrant an order for special cos......
  • United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union Local 2009 v Ghag,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 1, 2023
    ...the Court of Appeal, and another, by Justice Voith, when he was still a member of this Court. In AM Gold Inc. v. Kaizen Discovery Inc., 2022 BCCA 284, Justice Goepel wrote as follows at paras. 59–60: [59] Dishonest testimony alone is not sufficient to warrant an order for special cos......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT