An Jager v. Jager, 2019 NSCA 9

JudgeBourgeois
CourtCourt of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 31, 2019
JurisdictionNova Scotia
Citations2019 NSCA 9
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Howe v. Rees,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 16 Febrero 2023
    ...1-3 of the Society’s brief filed December 23, 2021. [5] His decision was approved of as well in MacVicar Estate v. MacDonald, 2019 NSCA 9, at para. 107:  “A proper application of the Rule at the trial level [6] I bear in mind that the Homburg case involved a 3-day motion,......
  • Hughes v. Cumberland (Municipality), 2019 NSCA 96
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 9 Diciembre 2019
    ...who seeks to advance an appeal which has been dismissed under Rule 90.43 (Leigh v. Belfast Mini-Mills, 2012 NSCA 67; An Jager v. Jager, 2019 NSCA 9).  However, I am also equally cognizant that allowing the appellant to continue in the face of the deficiencies discussed above would in t......
  • MacLean v. Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Appeals Tribunal),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 4 Marzo 2021
    ...the prejudice to Mr. MacLean if the appeal is dismissed (Leigh v. Belfast Mini-Mills, 2012 NSCA 67 at para. 22; An Jager v. Jager, 2019 NSCA 9 at para. 31), and the need for the exercise of restraint. That said, it would be entirely inconsistent, in the face of circumstances which mirror cl......
  • R. v. Hoyeck,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 16 Mayo 2022
    ...prejudice to a party who seeks to advance an appeal that is dismissed (Leigh v. Belfast Mini-Mills, 2012 NSCA 67; An Jager v. Jager, 2019 NSCA 9).  Nonetheless, permitting Mr. Hoyeck to continue would be inconsistent with similar decisions which have emphasized the need for parties eng......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Howe v. Rees,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 16 Febrero 2023
    ...1-3 of the Society’s brief filed December 23, 2021. [5] His decision was approved of as well in MacVicar Estate v. MacDonald, 2019 NSCA 9, at para. 107:  “A proper application of the Rule at the trial level [6] I bear in mind that the Homburg case involved a 3-day motion,......
  • Hughes v. Cumberland (Municipality), 2019 NSCA 96
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 9 Diciembre 2019
    ...who seeks to advance an appeal which has been dismissed under Rule 90.43 (Leigh v. Belfast Mini-Mills, 2012 NSCA 67; An Jager v. Jager, 2019 NSCA 9).  However, I am also equally cognizant that allowing the appellant to continue in the face of the deficiencies discussed above would in t......
  • MacLean v. Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Appeals Tribunal),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 4 Marzo 2021
    ...the prejudice to Mr. MacLean if the appeal is dismissed (Leigh v. Belfast Mini-Mills, 2012 NSCA 67 at para. 22; An Jager v. Jager, 2019 NSCA 9 at para. 31), and the need for the exercise of restraint. That said, it would be entirely inconsistent, in the face of circumstances which mirror cl......
  • R. v. Hoyeck,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 16 Mayo 2022
    ...prejudice to a party who seeks to advance an appeal that is dismissed (Leigh v. Belfast Mini-Mills, 2012 NSCA 67; An Jager v. Jager, 2019 NSCA 9).  Nonetheless, permitting Mr. Hoyeck to continue would be inconsistent with similar decisions which have emphasized the need for parties eng......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT